Research On Participatory Anti-Poverty In Tibetan Areas

Promoting Whole village to participate poverty alleviation as the representative project, anti-poverty Practice in China has begun to be taken shape. The idea of participatory is also becoming the mainstream thinking in the anti-poverty area. However, from the situation of the concrete implementation of the Poverty Reduction Project, we can find that there are still many other undesirable places. The phenomenon of lack of participation in the poor (or no enthusiasm, or without the participation opportunities) or the poverty alleviation be fraud or making image projects are emerging in endlessly. How to solve the participation predicament, there isn’t a desirable answer in the current study. At present, most of china’s poverty alleviation depends on the government departments, financial funds is the most important resource in this process. Therefore, what role the staff of government departments will play, and how to deal with the relationship between government departments and the masses are both inevitable topics. In this paper, Tibetan areas will be designed the object of the study, to analysis the main characteristics and influencing factors in different poverty alleviation projects, from the perspective of the political, economic, geographic, cultural, religious and institutional, then try to find the specific participatory anti-poverty manner which is suitable for Tibetan areas.The paper consists of eight chapters content, the specific structure and content of each chapter is organized as follows:Chapter Ⅰ,Introduction.The introductory part is mainly composed of the following components:The literature review both at home and abroad;the structure and content of the paper;the methods;the data sources;expected research innovation and insufficient.Chapter Ⅱ,The general analysis of participatory poverty theory.The first section,introduced the theoretical foundation of’participatory poverty’ and analysed the necessity and the feasibility of the implementation of participatory anti-poverty model, as well as the plight of the poor faced. The second section is to interpret the concept of participatory poverty, about the definition of ’participation’ and ’participatory anti-poverty’ The third section is focusing on the analysis of participatory antipoverty elements and to find the effective participation elements. The fourth section is analyzing the characteristics of the participation elements which is should be in the Tibetan participatory poverty.ChapterIII,History evolution of the poverty in Tibetan areas.In the first sectiori,showing the rationality and necessity for Tibetan areas of the Tibet Autonomous Region and the four provinces as a whole and unified object, from the characteristics of the national culture, administrative divisions, geographical environment and natural resources, market economy conditions.In the second section, reviewing the anti-poverty course of Tibet and Tibetan areas in Sichuan, Tibetan areas of Qinghai, Gansu and Yunnan. The Tibet Autonomous Region is as a typical representative which is divided into four stages of pre-1978;1978-1993;1994-2000;2001-2012.In the third section,summarizing the general characteristics of anti-poverty in Tibetan areas.In the fourth section, analyzing the necessity of participatory poverty in Tibetan areas.ChapterIV, Analysing The present situation of the participatory poverty in Tibetan areas-focusing on F County.In the first section, introducing F County—the researching object.Then, I have selected several highly representative projects and reinterpret them from the perspective of participatory.There are four stories, including’Educating people in different places’project, low social security project, housing alterations and agriculture industrialization. From them, we can see that if the participation is not effective, the poor can benefit little or even nothing. At last, based on the analysis to recognize the elements of participatory go on.Chapter V, The influential factors in the Tibetan areas’ participatory anti-poverty. To discuss the impact factors that affect the instruction of the participatory anti-poverty mode in Tibetan areas,from the geographical environment,social culture,government administrative mechanism and the financial strength of the local government.In which there are many positive factors as well as a lot of negative factors.They both can affect the participatory anti-poverty positively or negatively.Thus, they are must be concerned in the process of structure the participatory mode.ChapterVI, Perfecting participatory antipoverty Construction in Tibetan areas. The first section,introducing the principles of perfecting the Tibetan areas participatory poverty.The second section, putting forward the feasible path to perfect the Tibetan participatory poverty from five aspects.The third section,discussing how to perfect the participatory poverty of Tibetan areas from the aspects of system construction.The fourth section, discussing the technology to improve the Tibetan participatory poverty.In this paper, through systematic and deeply analysis, there is a more profound understanding about participatory anti-poverty in the Tibetan areas and there is maybe some breakthroughs in the following areas:Firstly, Recognizing the participatory anti-poverty in Tibetan areas from multidisciplinary visions,In order to more deeply explore the phenomenon of the ’helping rich not poverty’ in the anti-poverty work,the author not only have demonstrated the necessity and feasibility of participatory poverty, also introduced the theory of social capital theory and the cost-benefit, to explain why it’s difficult to get ideal income in the public decision-making for the poor. The conclusion is that we must attach importance to the function of the government in the process of participatory. The government department should choose the right elements, so as to improve the poor voice and policy influence.Secondly, deeping the elements of participation. The author from the poverty alleviation projects, to interpret the main internal structural and internal interests differentiation characteristics. Meanwhile, on the basis of the ’relevant public’in Thomas, the author continues to subdivide it into’positive public’and’negative public’;’strong public’and’weak public’,which can be used to find the most suitable participator s, especially the overseers.Thirdly, Discussing the micro and macro democracy in participatory poverty. The author emphatically discusses how the rational allocation of power could achieve between each participators in background of the macro representative democracy and direct democracy at the grass-roots level state concurrence.The author thinks that, reducing the cost of government departments to share power is the premise of making sure that the grassroots could get the substantive decision rights in participating.Meanwhile, changing the method of the formation of the evaluation of government performance evaluation indexes will become one of the keys to reduce the cost. Through the combination of ’bottom-up’ and ’top-down’ approach for evaluation standard is more effective in Tibetan areas.Fourthly, Adding the quality indicators for improving the efficiency of participatory anti-poverty. The author added the indicators which can help target the poor family and the quality of the project.