| The research on the sustainable livelihood of water conservancy resettlement is a frequently discussed and new issue.The article takes the water conservancy resettlement group as the research object,and focuses on the sustainable development after resettlement.It focuses on the two core words of social capital and livelihood ability,and is based on sustainable livelihood.The theoretical framework combined with field case analysis,attempts to reflect on the theory of sustainable livelihoods ability,believes that capital investment should be transformed into the ability of self-development,and universal trust is an indispensable and important element of social capital.Village identity is an effective path to transform capital and capacity,so village community awareness can form village self-development capacity and motivation,in order to solve the current problem of insufficient endogenous sustainable motivation for water conservancy resettlement.The concept of sustainable livelihood is based on the two concepts of "sustainability" and "livelihood",if livelihood is understood as a means and way of earning a living,sustainable livelihood is a long-term and stable realization of free choice life,it means that sustainable livelihoods should be measured in terms of human capacity development.Human ability is reproducible,capital in the field must realize competition and mutual transformation,in this process,capital can form a dynamic feasible ability,and feasible ability can form operational ability under the integration of system,resources,welfare,etc.So as to have a competitive advantage,and finally realize the functional activity state of free choice,and this process completes the transformation from capital to capability.Capability capital includes social capital and human capital,so social capital becomes the core element of capability capital,and a certain stock of social capital even affects the performance of human capital and plays the role of intermediary capital.The research on the sustainable livelihood of Ludila water conservancy resettlements has the general characteristics of large and medium-sized water conservancy immigrants at the current stage in my country and the uniqueness of the cultural influence of being located in the middle reaches of the Jinsha River,it is one of the areas where the rural revitalization strategy is implemented.It has been seven or eight years since the relocation of the reservoir area,and the resettlements gradually adapted to the new resettlement living,development or sustainable development becomes a primary concern of local governments and resettlement groups.Under the guidance of country power,various types of capital investment for water conservancy resettlements are increasing,the local urbanization is an opportunity for the development of resettle areas,the living environment,medical care and education conditions of resettlements are generally better than before.However,from the perspective of the overall development of people,there are obvious unsustainable factors in the current development situation,the livelihood ability of resettlements does not match the new capital situation,and the investment of foreign capital has not been transformed into the endogenous sustainable livelihood ability of resettlements,the group lacks sustainable internal development motivation.Behind the economic problems are more cultural problems.When the resettlements adapts to the new way of living,it is obvious that they lack general trust and lack of cooperation ability.Although other villages also have such a common phenomenon,this is not only the market economy’s impact on villages,the general performance of penetration is also related to the historical and cultural development background of each village,the resettle villages have both the common problems of ordinary rural areas and the particularities of resettle villages.Combined with the historical roots of the resettle villages,it is found that the weak foundation of general trust existed before the resettlement,which is related to the special cultural and historical background of the local resettlements.The degree of social connection between them forms an interest-oriented social network of villages,when the development of modern agriculture requires farmers to cooperate spontaneously to improve the adaptability and anti-risk ability of individual small farmers,the lack of spontaneous cooperation is also highlighted.Therefore,starting from the village’s self-development ability,build a village community consciousness based on village identity,and form a cohesive role of moral farmers facing village life,this inherent cultural value of mutual trust forms the village’s cooperative structure,which can improve village cohesion,it is a path for small farmers to adapt to modernization,and it is also a subconscious habit formed by villagers in the village.It is an excellent traditional culture that can still be invoked after the village has experienced hundreds of years of development,thus forming a village governance that is different from other villages,after the community has experienced the baptism of time,it can still have the most powerful village development vitality.In this way,it provides a research idea for the study of the sustainable development of water conservancy immigrants.When studying sustainable livelihood issues,the impact of the local culture and historical background of livelihood of the research group cannot be ignored.While improving the environment and funding issues,it is necessary to pay more attention to the social capital of the immigrant group,condition and adaptive capacity,transition from mere capital investment to capacity improvement.The village community consciousness based on village identity is the spontaneous cooperation of the same value identity formed by mutual benefit,human affection and public opinion between people,and it may become the driving force for the development of the village from within.Further reflection on the theory of sustainable livelihoods ability,social capital has a role in promoting economic development and can be transformed into a feasible capability.In addition to institutional norms,more attention should be paid to the constraints of informal norms in villages,that is,cultural accumulation in villages.In addition,social capital can be acquired and can be continuously enhanced through external investment,so when using sustainable livelihood theory to study domestic village development issues,top-down village community awareness can be reconstructed. |