The Limits Of Important Character And Instinct Of Science

Based on science limited questioned science and even opposition science are a contemporary academic circles's fashionable ideological trend. Because since science birth, The humanity in the cognition, economy and the whole civilized aspect is always in accelerates to develop, gradually causes to the most scholars to regard as science in the cognition and the rationality is the complete thing, the standard scientific philosophy emerged in 20th century unexpectedly attempts proofing science completeness in the scientific theory or principle. But this kind of proof not only has met the barrier or difficulty which doesn't overstep with, but the thorough research instead indicated that, science has the limits, neglect or misunderstanding this kind of scientific limits, also will bring the negative influence to the human cognition and the life. The question lies in, another some scholars rest on the limits of science which promulgates, not only question and critique classics scientific view, but walks to suspicion and critique science, on the opposition science path; This has brought a more tremendous negative influence to the human cognition and the life. Actually, scientific limited is born that way, It is the product which the human long-term pursue cognitive universality and objective request unifies, that is it is the rationality and experience realizes the son which the marriage lives. However, this kind of marriage certainly cannot produce a neutral man and woman's compound person. This article through to three question's basic aspect related "what science is "of the explanation, the progress of science and the difference of science and non- science inspection, on the one hand promulgates the universality of science to have the explicit premise, the scientific real diagnosis is greatly different to the science is objective; On the other hand also promulgates, scientific limited is basically different from non- scientific limited, we definitely must regard this explicit developable limits as the characteristic moral character of science, and from this conclusion clarifies about "what is science" in the viewpoint muddled understanding, criticizes each erroneous view which this current fashionable ideological trend contains.