Nationality's Aesthetic Words In The Commonness Of Mother And Person Who Live For Party

For a long time, the concept of proletariat's literature has always been ambiguous. Mostly people emphasize the generality characteristics of proletariat's literature: " class nature " and " Party spirit"; and regard it as the behavior of political ideology under specific historical linguistic context; So under the contemporary linguistic context, most of proletariat's literary works have been classified into " type " and "concept". Those inspiring proletariat's literary works have become an antique in limbo among consumerism linguistic context, even if accidentally remembered by scholars, most of them are classified as the reference frame of literary criticism irony and criticizing reading.Nearly two years, people's long for emotional and rational values drive "Rearrangement ofrevolutionary literature " in Russia, Poland , Hungary and China . Proletariat's Literature attracted great attention of critics and thinkers once again, and also aroused the writer's interest in studying the case of proletariat's literature.Compared Gao Er-ji's Mother with KOBAYASHITAJIKI's Person Who Live for Party , the author finds out there are many comparative factors: First, Russia Su and Japanese proletariat's literature have obvious relationship of " broadcasting " and " accepting "; Second , both of the two writers have equally great influence in their own country's proletariat's literature. Gao Er-ji was the standard-bearer of proletariat's literature in Russia, and Xiao Lin was a remarkable representative in Japanese. Third, two works are surprisingly similar in content and structure: Both of them have a son and a mother; both describe the inspiration of proletariat campaign; both are about the whole proletariat's rather than their individual interests; both of the characters sacrificed their personal interests for the Party. Finally, under contemporary linguistic context two works are similar and considered as "seasonable literature serving politics ". Among those numerous comparatives, this paper pays much attention to the following: the differences of national spirit and culture in two works' generality; and completely different aesthetic words in two works. The writer is wondering: If proletariat literature...