Chuan DuanKangCheng And Mu ShiYing-Comparison On Characteristics Of The New Sensational School

In October 1924, the Japanese writers—— HengGuangLiYi , ChuanDuanKangCheng, PianGuangTieBing and all together, fourteen people founded a magazine "Literature Times". In November, the same year, the famous literary critic QianYeGuiXiong aiming at "Literature Times", punished a special essay "The Birth of The New Sensational School", which gave a name to the new sensational school in Japan. The Chinese writer Li Na Ou founded "Trolley Train", which tried the artistic pursuit of new sensational school in Japan at the first time. Afterwards, Shi Ying Mu, Zhe Cun Shi proceeded novels creation of new sensational school. They held the magazine "Modern Times" as their position, reflected similar tendency of creation, so the new sensational school in China came into being.Although the existence of new sensational school novel in China and Japan was in a short time, their affect to the field of literature was not underestimated. New sensational school in Japan was named "seismic literature", while was named "recreational literature" in China, because of their different background. The works created by the writers of new sensational school in Japan used to reflect the relationship between human and human also the thought of philosophy in capitalism society. The writers of new sensational school in China described in a limited scope, various circumstances in Shang Hai, a modern city in 1930s.Their works put emphasis on the exposition of rotten and degenerate life of bourgeoisie.Mu Shi Ying and ChuanDuanKangCheng were the leaders of the new sensational school in China and Japan respectively. Although their literary activities were not restricted within the creation of new sensational school novels, they has more or less relationship with the new sensational school. They held the views that they should combine the western modern school with local literary tradition, proceed from the way of the combination of the west and the east. Two writers differs from each other in some aspects such as sensational form, thinking manner, aesthetic appreciation even the object of emotion because of different social literary background as well different spirit personality.This paper makes a parallel comparison between the novels of the two writers. It elaborates different creative specialty of the two writers in hopes of finding out their literary aesthetic value and literary contribution. So, we can affirm the position and significance of the two writers in literary history. It also can make the readers absorb more literary nourishment from different countries, different national writers and works in the same period by the comparative research.