On Heidegger's Interpretation Of Kant's Thesis About Being

Up to the present we can see two books about Kant's thesis about Being in Heidegger's complete works. First ,therefore, this text will analyse the two texts respectively .Then, this text will explain the meaning of Heidegger's interpretation of Kant's thesis about Being .This text is divided into three parts:The first part is a analysis of Heidegger's interpretation of Kant's thesis about Being in The basic problem of phenomenology .Heidegger had analysed Kant's thesis : Being is not a real predicate and he thought that being equals position, Dasein equals absolute position and perception in kant .Heidegger pushed forward kant's thesis about Being phenomenologically where kant stop step , and he thought Kant's thesis about Being must led in particular to a basic ontological problem ,the problem of ontological difference. As a result, we can also think that the investigation of Heidegger is an enter to "being and time" from Kant.The second part is a textual analysis to Heidegger's Kant's thesis about Being .In this text, Heidegger destruct Kant's thesie about Being in being-history, he thought that the age-old prevailing meaning of being(constant presence) not only is preserved in Kant's critical interpretation of being as the objectness of the object of experience, but even reappears in an exceptional form in the definition of "objectness".The third part will explain the meaning of Heidegger's interpretation of Kant's thesis about Being .This text thinks that Kant and Heidegger both pushing forward previous philosophy ,but the push always is a retreatment .In the first text, Heidegger thought that kant only retreat to our facility of knowing ,but Dasein's constitution of ontology is more original. In the second text, Heidegger destruct Kant's thesis about Being in being-history,and inquiry the place where Kant stand in the context of whole western metaphysics.