Font Size: a A A

The Validity Of Interpretation: Comparison Of Thinking Between Hirsch And Gadamer

Posted on:2009-06-22Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:X R ChenFull Text:PDF
GTID:2155360245981295Subject:Foreign philosophy
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
This essay contains four chapters. In front of three chapters are around Gaudier and Hirsch. They started discussion about the problems of Hermeneutics. Chapterâ…£is my comments to the objectivism spirit of Hirsch .At the same time, I made my own questions.The first chapter is on the problem of the art text. Gademer explained that the original understanding is the centre of the works. The art text open structure; Hirsch is the text of Bathes called "the author text", it is closed structure. chapterâ…¡around the artistic language and start the discussion. Gadamer specified ontology language; Hirsch was against this opinion. He specified application for this language is the carrier of meaning. chapterâ…¢is on the interpretation of the historic problem of discussion. Gadamer thought that history is relative; we must understand the traditional elements in the history of relations. Hirsch advocated the return of history. chapterâ…£is my doubt, including the scientific and objective text of Hirsch; "meaning" and "significance" of the distinction; "meaning of author".
Keywords/Search Tags:text, language, history, meaning, significance
PDF Full Text Request
Related items