Research On 'V+在' And The Related Sentences

This paper is divided into six parts.The first part is introduction, which explained the object and scope of the study, the way of study,the purpose and significance of study,the introduction of corpus linguistics.The second part introduced previous research results, which mainly on predecessors's reserch for"NP+V+在+NL"and"NP+V+在+了+NL","NP+V+O+在+NL",and the part of speech of"在"after the verb.In the third part,through the transformation of T:"V+在+NL→V+到+NL", first the"NP+V+在+NL"Sentence is divided into two major categories: action sentence and state sentence. Then according to whether the"在+NL"can be used before V, as well as some special type of analysis, further divided the"NP+V+在+NL"Sentence into two types: pure state sentence and secondary action sentence.Then,from the structural classification of verb in the"NP+V+在+NL","NP+V+在+了+NL","NP+V+O+在+NL"sentence, we can see because of Chinese demand on the beauty of rhythm, the two-syllable verb used into three formats have strict requirements. It is dificcult to enter these three sentences for the verb-object and verb- complement compound words, because the position of the noun components of the verb-object compound words and the complementary components of verb- complement compound words in the"NP+V+O+在+NL"sentence conflict with the O's position .Through the"NP+V+在+NL","NP+V+在+了+NL","NP+V+O+在+NL"on the semantics of the verb to the classification,we concluded that only the verb which action is simpler, less intensity, longer stay to a certain state, more tend to be static, and which has the semantics of"make sth. remain"or"make sth. attached to", is easier to enter the"NP+V+O+在+NL"sentence; Through the contrast analysis of the conditions that enter into the"V+在+NL","V+在+了+NL","V+O+在+NL"format, and the co-occurrence time words, found that"V+在+了+NL"express the realization and completion of action, can only be used in the follow-up sentence. And"V+O+在+NL"is not a self-contained format, can only be used as the originator or the first sentence,only the one which verb followed by"了"can be used for follow-up sentence;Through the analysis of the three kind of sentence's context, chapter, article style and individual style, we found that semantic choice of the three sentence restrictions on the largest, followed by the sentence of coherence, consistency constraints, and only then were the subjective choice of constraints.In the fourth part, from the analysis of the constructional semanteme and the three-sentencemutual replacement situation of"NP+V+NL","NP+V+到+NL","NP+V+向+NL"sentence, concluded:the factors that decided to the differences of the three-sentence constructional semanteme, and whether they can replace each other, the first is verb semantic features can decide whether or not it can match with"在","到","向",the other is"在","到","向"differences in their grammatical meaning."在","到","向"significant differences in grammar, stem from their initial verb meaning differences.In the fifth part, to analyse the part of speech of"在"after the verb classified, said that the"V+在+NL"developed from"V+於(于)+NL"and"V+著(着)+NL", When the Five Dynasties and the Sui and Tang Dynasties, the usage of"在"introduced the location words was the absolute superiority, that is, the confluence of these two lines. After that, the"在"in"V+在+NL"format developed respectively."在"in state sentence of modern Chinese inherited the preposition, and Eventually stabilized. In the meanwhile,"在"in action sentence in development gradually attached to the verb to form"V在"style,"在"virtual into a supporting role only-- the"trend of particle."The last part expained the lack of this paper.