The Study On The Format Of "V Shenme V"

"V shenme V" is a common format of colloquial expression, the form of the "V" refers to the verb in this format, same as the "V" form of "shenme" before and after, but due to the two formats play as different role, so recorded the "V" in front of "shenme" as " V1", recorded the "V" in behind "shenme" as " V2".The text is divided into three parts. The first part study the structure format of the "V shenme V", that is, "V shenme V" format means the speaker have a subjective act of negation of the existence, state or action, and as a result of "V" of their different nature, "V shenme V "may have wo different means: One is "V" have a subjective act of negation about the action, that is, on the "V" by the acts of the value of that negative action, the desire to discourage or prohibit, reflecting the speaker's discontent, which means "Don't V" ," not allowed V "or" should not be V "; the second is a" V" expressed by the existence of the subjective state of the negative, which means" not to V ".The second part analysis of the conditions of "V shenme V" format, the use of conditions including the use of context and the choice of use. There are two main use of context of "V shenme V" format: one is that the subjective negative of the point of view of others, then the format of the "V" inherited a verb in the words of others; second is the subjective state of action or negative of the established context of the objective a person's, that negative is always be the first, do not inherit the verb of the others.The author describes "V shenme V" of the tend to select the following five verbs, they are: the virtual format of a verb, judge verb, the order verb can be ready to verbs and verbs tend to select these five verbs, and on this basis to further explore the "V shenme V" the verb form of the selection mechanism, that is, whether obedient behavior, status, or the listener's point of view, into the "V shenme V" format must be the Speaker of the obedient person that made the focus of information. Therefore, the verb can not empty into the "V shenme V" format, because the imaginary of the verb itself does not specify the meaning of the action act is absolutely impossible to become obedient people made the focal point of information; judge verbs and verbs become order by Speaker obedient person that made the focal point of information, you can enter the "V shenme V" format; to be willing to separate predicate verb can enter the "V shenme V" format, as adverbial words, we must become obedient people who believe issued by the focal point of information before they can enter the "V shenme V" format; trend verb alone will be able to enter the "V shenme V" format, but can not be entered when complement "V shenme V" format.The third part discusses the "V shenme V" format with "V shenme" the relationship between format. "V shenme" format is derived from the interrogative sentence in the negative, derived from table to table questions about the process of negation, although the "weakening the role of reference", but it is still preserved under such a "refers to generation" features, that is representative of a certain "entities" or refer to a specific content. So, "V shenme" format that the speaker of the existence of acts of state or action related to the subjective content of the negative. And "V shenme V" format of the existence of the speaker, state or action of the subjective act of negation. The former is more emphasis on the content of what is involved; the latter is even more emphasis on the existence, status or action itself. With more than two differences, mainly due to the existence of V2's, V2 for the identification of differences between the two played a decisive role. Based on three: one is that of cognitive linguistics, "the number of iconicity (quantitative iconicity)", that "the amount of information at a conceptual level, and more important information more difficult to forecast, and its language on the longer, more complex "; the other is initiated by Chinese scholars syntactic grammar and semantic principles of mutual authentication, specifically, syntax can be started from the form, you can start from the semantics, but if you start from the form which resulted in the sense of need to find a basis for; if starting from the meaning, the conclusion of the performance need to find form, that is, grammatical meaning of the syntax to pass a certain form, must be found to verify the formal grammar; The third is cognitive linguistics the "highlights" theory, that is, "From a cognitive psychological perspective, it is easy to highlight the cause of the things people pay attention to things, but also easy to remember, easy to extract and easy to deal with things as psychological." Although there is differences between the two, but at the same time "V shenme" format contains "V shenme V" format. "A one-way implication B" is the logic of the definition of A is true, then B is also true, the contrary is not. "V shenme" by denying the existence of the format, status or action related to the content of the act and eventually negate the existence of acts of state or action, and "V shenme V" format is the subjective act of direct negative of existence, status or action. That is to say, "V shenme" format is negative of the necessity of V, thereby negating the need to produce such an inevitable outcome of V, it is indirect; and "V shenme V" format is simply the negative of V, it is straightforward."V shenme" format→denying the existence of the format, status or action related to the content of the act→negate the existence of acts of state or action"V shenme V" format→negate the existence of acts of state or actionThat is to say, "V shenme" format is true, then the "V shenme V" format is also true; but, "V shenme V" format for real, "V shenme" format is not necessarily true.Their relationship can be show in a "one-way implicate":"V shenme" format→"V shenme V" formatThe implicate of the one-way meaning is: "V shenme" format is true, then the "V shenme V" format is also true; "V shenme V" format for real, "V shenme" format is not necessarily true. That is, if the speaker can use the "V shenme V" format to express their point of view, it certainly can also use "V shenme" format to express, on the contrary is not.To sum up, the article detailed analysis three part of "V shenme V" format. The general guiding theory of the text is "Construction Grammar" theory, the article not only have summed up the experience of the predecessors, but also have some innovations from the author. The first part have a whole study of "V shenme V" format, the predecessors are basically have a study of the separate components; the second part aims to improve the conclusions of our predecessors, and try to explore selection mechanism of the verb in the "V shenme V "format; the purpose of the third part is showing the the essential character in contrast in the" V shenme V" of the format.I believe that there is a great theoretical value and practical value of this issue: "Construction Grammar" theory is a new theory of the study of language in recent years, the article is another attempt of the theoretical study of Chinese grammar, which will not only enrich existing theoretical results of "Construction Grammar", but also contribute to "Construction Grammar" Theory in the further development in our country; "V shenme V" is the form of modern Chinese common phenomenon, especially in the modern Chinese spoken language, this article studies on this format , especially for the "V shenme V" format with "V shenme" format of differences research, there is no doubt have an important guiding and reference value of the teaching Chinese as a foreign language.