Inter-Provincial Autonomy And It's Reflective

In early 20th century,, China has experienced a federalism attempt. In some Federalist propaganda, domestic rise of a wave of federalism trend, some scholars and politicians in China in the "federalist" approach to federalism began the practice in China for the first time. The federalist movement was at people's high hopes, and even was awarded the settlement for several thousand years of Chinese history and a centralized autocratic China at that time the reality of warlordism arduous mission.Time in Qing Dynasty, China has experienced the ravages of corruption and foreign imperialism, the fruit of another 1911 Revolution into the hands of Yuan Shih-kai, in the restoration of the monarchy after the fall of Yuan Shikai, China fell into a warlord situation, some researchers are applying a variety of reasons attributed to the central the drawbacks of centralization, the hopes for the blue version of the U.S. federal system in China to embark on the attitude of local self-government, a time, federalism in China has been the concern of scholars and politicians, and sought after.Inter-Provincial Autonomy from the Hunan Province put forward the "ruling Xiang Xiang" slogan, and rapidly affecting the whole of China's local warlords, the provinces have put forward the "autonomy" slogan, and many provinces of the Constitutional Commission was established and begin to implement the formulation of the draft constitution province, Hunan ", Hunan Constitution," also can be put into practice. The implementation of the federalist when people all have their own purpose, scholars and people want the federalist be able to bring freedom and democracy in China, local warlords who want to have hope that the federalist-ruled areas can bring their own peace and stability, there others call Inter-Provincial Autonomy as a means to achieve local self-government, from the central government's intervention and control.With the launching of the federalist movement, federalism and the contradiction between the situation in China is gradually prominent. In the end, the federalist movement are not as what people want, as Cao Kun in 1923 the Government announced the integration of the unity of the Republic of France quietly withdraw from the stage of history, had been given to the many missions have failed to complete.While the federalist movement was eventually abandoned, but was thinking of federalism in the country caused a great response, in this period of China's federalist ideas, has its own characteristics, it is specifically targeted at the warlord and the bearer of national the hope of a unified, has a large number of domestic and foreign scholars in the political environment.The federalist movement's failure, not because some scholars say the federalist is a false democracy of the warlords, not because of any shortcomings in a federal system itself, but because at that time in China, the spread of federalism is also not wide enough and thorough, it is for the federal study is not enough depth of China's own long-standing unitary monolithic idea of the long-term effects, making the Chinese people not ready to meet the federal preparations at a time when the civil war years of the politicalenvironment-induced of the federalist movement, but to the federalist movement coupled with too heavy a burden, too eager for the federalist demands eventually led people to abandon federalism. China's federalism from ecentralization can not host, national unity, eradication of partisan struggle this important historic task.