The Nature Of Guo Moruo's Literary Criticism In 17 Years

Guo Moruo is a "ball genius", in literature, history, archeology and other aspects accomplish something, but his most important contribution and the first is in the field of literature. Overview of Guo's literary creation, in addition to historical dramas outside their style and ideas have undergone tremendous changes. In the twenties and thirties of last century his literary works emerged advocated a similar hurricane advance style towering passion, literarily,and respectsd the Art only , from the 40's onwards, this edge is gradually weakened, even after the founding of The People's Republic of China his works prudented cautious and inflexibility. For some issues, such as content determines form, revolutionary consciousness, and the sense of people repeatedly stated in many articles. At present, because the lost of data and research method is single, the research of literary criticism after Guo changed is still very weak, so this article is in the collection and sorting Guo's literary criticism in the 17 years of the Lost, based on the analysis of the text by Reading to study literary criticism of Guo in 17 years and is divided into three chapters, from three aspects to analyse the nature of Guo's literary criticism in 17 years.The first chapter major studys the politicization of Guo's literary criticism in 17 years, on the case of his commentary about Mao Zedong's poems. Guo's articles filled a lot of political discourse, the support of his adulation of Mao Zedong and the analysis of the situation on the domestic and international, so that these articles show a strong political tendency, this trend has two unique features, first, the politicization is different from the previous articles, in the previous articles they are political factors, and the political content did not become a center for arts in general , questions are still surrounding the conduct , but in the review article in this part of Mao Zedong, the literary giving political, literature truly become a tool for social and political service. Second, while Guo have differences from the Politics of scholars - which contains art of interpretation and thus sui generis, the combination of dominant and recessive is the unique political tendency to become one of the characteristics of Guo's literary criticism in 17 years.The second chapter mainly analysis the idealism characteristic of Guo's literary criticism in 17 years ,to his comment articles about Qu Yuan as an example.Guo from the research the poet Qu Yuan to comment revolutionary statesman Qu Yuan, it is his romantic idealism caused ,also reflects the idealism of the state and revolutionary. Guo's idealism is a consistent temperament, the changed is historical context only. Before the founding the idealism of Guo was mainly reflected in his poetry, and in 17 years, this color mostly focused on literary and artistic criticism, as one of its characteristics of literary criticism. The analysis on Guo's nature of romantic idealism start from three aspects: First, from the practical needs and inner feelings of the common starting to Qu Yuan, who demonstrate Guo's idealism; Second, through Guo's comment about Qu Yuan to analyse; Third,through the relationship of research and reviews between Guo and Qu Yuan to analyse the characteristics of idealism.Chapter III major study the addiction of history and textual of Guo's literary criticism, take his comments about Chen Duansheng and "ZaiShengYuan" as example. History and historical figures concern is the creation of Guo has been the tendency , learning from history is the starting point, before the founding the history of addiction tend mainly on hie academic research, while after the founding Guo heavily focus on historical figures in literary criticism, the addiction of history and textual was distinct characteristics in these articles. This paper from two aspects to analyse, on the one hand by Guo a lot of meticulous research on Chen Duansheng and "ZaiShengYuan", and as a basis for analysis the addiction of textual; on the other hand, the comments about Chen Duansheng is reflecting his emphasis on history, the addiction of history is its performance. The reason is Guo's own love of history, and a clever choice in complex social reality .