Comparison Study On Legislation Of The Sidelong Price Alliance

The sidelong price alliance is the widespread phenomenon in China's economic life. It is not only harmful to the consumer, but also to the competition order. Therefore, it is given the severe legal responsibility in every country (district).But with it sharp contrasted, China's sidelong price alliances take place high frequency. Furthermore, they are always announced in the public, and hardly have been published by the government. So 1 think we must afterthought China's legal institution. By comparing, we can find out our shortage and we can bring forward the legislative suggestion on china's law. This article is discussed according to the train of thought of bringing up problems- analyzing problems-resolving problems.The article includes four chapters except for the headnote and the epilog.The headnote introduces some typical cases of sidelong price alliances and brings up the problems in our country.The first chapter mainly analyses the sidelong price alliances from theory. The first section brings forward the definition of the sidelong price alliance from the definition of the "price alliance", and analyses it's characteristic, the second section mainly introduces the principle-per se rule and its integrants.The second chapter mainly generalizes the chief forms of sidelong price alliance and the author analyses the special form of sidelong price alliance-business selfschooling price. The article points out the dramatic harmfulness of it and points out the urgent request of managing this phenomenon.In the third chapter, the author chooses America, German, Japan, European community and Taiwan district, analyzing the legal institution about sidelong price alliance in their law.The author compares and analyses their country's law about sidelong price alliance from the institution for enforcing law, legislation responsibility and exclusion clause.In the fourth chapter, the author points out the deficiency in China's law about sidelong price alliance and advances their experience from which we can draw lessons and points out the lawmaking suggestion on our law.The epilog gives the article's way of thinking brush and emphasis the article's viewpoint the second time, and points out the article's deficiency.