The Analysis Of Zhu Yanling Appeals GM Food Of Nestle Case

Starting from the 70s of the last century, biotechnology has had rapid development. The appearance of GM food highlights great impact on the public. As the ordinary consumer, the people have right to know about purchased food, especially GM food. Biotechnology artificially changes steady genetic makeup, has evolved a hundred million years, so the safety of GM food need to further research and practice. The legislation of GM food in china is still weak and it's only involve in low low-level legislation, such as administrative rules. It does not match more and moe GM food flowing into magket. The reasonable legal system is very important to consumers' safety. Law is no reason to limit the development of GM food, but ensure the right to know of consumers,especially under the current circumstance of the safety of GM food has not been defined. As for GM food, only consumers have right to know can right to choose and the right to choose ensure the right of safety.The paper selects the typical case of Zhu Yanling appeals GM food of Nestle. According to the actual condition of GM food market. I analyze the disputed focuses of the case and hold up some feasible proposals to complete the right to know of consumers and GM food identity system. The paper is divided into three parts: The first chapter introduces the basic case and the hearing information; The second chapter analyzes the disputed focuses combing our country's law. The third chapter ponders the flaws of legislation in GM food and finally put forward some suggestions on the basis of that thought.