"De-Administration" Or "Strengthening Administration"

The administrative strengthening in the court system has become a disturbing factor of jurisdiction justice. In consideration that confusion of roles are triggered time and time again during the law practice due to the long-term ambiguous definition of jurisdiction, de-administration has taken a vacancy on the agenda of judicial reform. However, to our pity, on account of the restrictions of the extended Augean stables and political system, etc., there have come, instead, some measures to strengthen administration during the course of judicial reform. This phenomenon is a reflection that the decision-makers are lack of basic knowledge and understanding of the different logics of the court system and the administrative system, thus leading to the self-contradictory reforms. After their recognition of the malpractice of administration strengthening in the court system and judicial reform, the judicial reform shall firmly head forward in the light of de-administration and prevent administration strengthening instead. In this paper, by observing the phenomenon, the author analyzes the phenomenon and penalties of administration strengthening in the court system, explores appropriate countermeasures and attitudes to be adopted in the future judicial reform, and envisions the modes for the court mechanism rationalization.