Research On Non-Litigious Administrative Execution

According to the administrative law, the administrative subject requests the administrative counterpart fulfill the certain public law duty mainly based on the administrative law to realize the effective social management. To this, the counterpart usually has three kinds of manner. The first is fulfilling the duty on his own initiative. The second is proposing objection. The third is neither fulfilling nor proposing objection. To achieve the administrative goal, maintain the normal management order, according to legal rule, if the counterpart does not fulfill his duty nor propose the administrative proceedings, the administrative subject may enforce the duty on the counterpart by applying for the People's Court. This is the subject of my thesis, non-litigious administrative execution.Nowadays in our country the cases of non-litigious administrative execution have exceeded the ones of administrative lawsuit largely, so non-litigious administrative execution is an important component of the administrative compulsory execution system in our country. Now the phenomenon of judicial confusion has come into being because of many reasons, such as, there are less laws and regulations which can regulate the non-litigious administrative execution; the regulations on it is not clear; furthermore, the articles contradict with each other. Facing such situations the experts shoud begin a deeper theoretical reserch which will make the completion and perfection of law system. Based on the current research fruits and practical experiences, this article will have a further analysis and discussion and propose the methods in order to provide some useful ideas for the completion of the non-litigious administrative execution. This article contains five parts and the following are the detailed contents of them:The first part mainly illustrates the concept,characteristics and quality of the non-litigious administrative execution. The non-lawsuit administrative execution refers to an action that the court, according to the application of the administrative subject or the person who has the rights, compels administrative relative person to perform the obligation determined by the specific administrative acts performed by administrative subject . If, in the legal term, administrative relative person neither prosecute nor perform their obligations. The non-litigious administrative execution takes on some features as administrativeness of executive basis, universality of executive object, compulsoriness of executive manner and so on. There are two completely different views about the nature of the non-lawsuit administrative execution between the theorists. One view considers that, the non-lawsuit administrative execution is an administrative action; the other holds that, the non-lawsuit administrative execution is a judicial action. In my opinion, the scholars holding different ideas, actually come to a conclusion by analyzing the non-lawsuit administrative execution from different perspectives and in different stages. The author considers that we cannot make a single cognition to the character of the non-lawsuit administrative execution. The non-lawsuit administrative execution actually includes two stages, i.e. deciding stage of execution and concrete operating stage of execution. In the former stage, the non-lawsuit administrative execution has the character of administrative nature, and in the latter stage, it has the character of judicial nature.The second part is mainly about the basic theories of the non-litigious administrative executive legal and institutionalized means to unlegal compulsory powers. "Without relief equals no rights" is the essence of the rights protection. It is the existent basic of the public rights to protect the civil rights. So the government excutive department should provide the effective ways to cilil rights'relief.The third part is about research on the non-litigious administrative execution of the two law systems. In contemporary world, there are two large modes of compulsory execution, that is , theory of separation of powers, thoery of the basic human rights protection and theory of rights relief. It is the essence of theory of separation of powers that the state power is divided into legislative, executive and judicial powers which restraint and corporate with each other. Whether or not to be recognized the human rights are rights belonging to all in any time or any situation. Regardless of any differences any human being can possess it.Theory of human rights protection can provide execution: one with execution of administrative subject as the dominant and the other with judicature as the dominant. The former has two representatives such as Germany and Japan, and the latter has three as America, England and France. Generally examining the two large modes of compulsory execution, harmony and balance of democracy and efficiency is the theme of a country under the rule of law. Every country tries to give attention to both sides and unite them as possible as they can.The fourth part mainly analyses the causes of the non-litigious administrative execution and outlines the problems existing in its operation. The author illustrates the six causes in the following: 1.Cognition regarding the executive power as the judicail power. 2.The continuous improvement of the judicial functions and the inevitable requirements of the law ruling consturction. 3.The comparison of executive effects between the administrative department and the court. 4.Worries about the administrative department's implementing the executive power. 5.The effects brought out by the principle of separation between trial and execution. 6.Implementing non-litigious administrative execution's benefits to focusing the administrative compulsory executing power and lowering cost of the compulsory execution. There are five main problems in the operating of the non-administrative execution cited as the follows: 1.Lacking the clear,unified and rational criteria classifying the executive authority's own implementing and applying for the court's executing. 2.Dissatisfactory effects of judicial control's rights. 3.Confused situation of compromising. 4.Lacking the relief means of the administrative authority's not handling the problems. 5.Being not conducive to the administrative counterparts' rights protection and relief.The fifth part proposes some ideas promoting the further completion of the non-litigious of administrative execution. 1.Determining the criteria classifying the non-litigious administrative executing and the administrative authority's own implementing. 2.Enforcing the separation of the rights of decisive and executive implementing. 3.Determining the rational scope of the compromising. 4.Establishing the administrative system of public prosecution. 5.Regulating means of protecting and relieving the administrative counterparts's rights in operating the non-litigious administrative execution. There are the detailed ways as follows: establishing the administrative hearing system and new reviewing standard in its operating; relief of the administrative counterparts' rights in the non-litigious administrative execution.