A Study On The Main Logical Concepts Of Mohism

Chinese academic thought the Qin Dynasty is great period of development, the relationship between the name of the real problem is the focus of each debate, and thus produced Chinese ancient "ZHENG MING "logic thought, in Ancient China. Mo Di initiated by His School, a comprehensive and systematic study of "ming", "ci", "shuo", "bian" various forms of thinking and its laws, constructed logical system. This is unique in China. Moti is a Chinese history as a logical theory to study the great thinkers. Moti is primarily a logical application specialist, but he also made many of the concepts of logic, such as "lei", "gu", "fa" ("li"), three-table method as his epistemology is logical proof method used in the course of a specific debate a large number of logical reasoning methods, such as deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning, analogical reasoning, noting that the law of contradiction and logical thinking law of excluded middle. In short, Mo Di logical thinking being founded in spite of its shortcomings, but he established a relatively complete logical system to lay the groundwork for the later Mohist.Mohist Logic is the only ancient China and India, with Aristotle logic logic (Hetuvidya school) par logical system, Mohist,especially in the latter part of Mohist ancient Chinese system of logic as the founder of the theory for the development of Chinese ancient logical thinking to make a great contribution. Mo Di Mohist logic thinking began in earnest in the late Mohist peaked in ancient China, where logical thought. Logical thinking mainly in the late Mohism was later known as the "MO BIAN" of six articles in. "MO BIAN" is the peak of ancient Chinese logic thinking, is the highest representative of Chinese ancient logical thought. You can say "MO BIAN" roughly equivalent to Western classical logic proposed doctrine system, in terms of concept, judgment, reasoning, logic, law and others have their own opinions. Proposed ming,ci,shuo,lei,gu,li,etc, so the physical basic logic concepts.Pointed out that the "debate" the purpose and principles of action and Mo Di category, therefore, to the creation of a class-based approach it is reasonable, "san wu luo ji "; the judge put forward" huo,jia,xiao "and other way to judge; on the" shuo "in the late Mohist where the equivalent of reasoning "-said to know, but later did not put Mohist" shuo zhi"when The only means of access to knowledge as they also put forward a number of specific theory style, such as "pi,mou,yuan,tui,zhi,nuo" and so on; late Mohist also found logical thinking of the basic law of the law of contradiction, excluded middle and with all.Because the characteristics of Chinese characters and language, Asia Richter Dodd logic, compared to Asia Richter Dodd logic and India Hetuvidya disadvantage is that there is no formal Mohist Logic, the lack of research in the form of reasoning, too focused on the specific topic of debate, logic system is not clear and complete, but Mohist Logic also has its own strengths, it has tried in the "bian shuo" in the introduction of variables, conducted formal logic attempts; This paper attempts to compare the three classical logic research, designed to help us correct Evaluation of "MO BIAN" logic, understand that the "MO BIAN" logical position in China and even in the world history of logic, while highlighting its significance in the current era.