A Study Of Sartre 's Theory Of "Learning From The Field"

Jean - Paul·Sartre is one of the greatest philosophers of the 20th century in France and even in the world. As a representative of existentialist philosophy, Sartre’s philosophy is a kind of philosophy which seeking the existential man. He advocates that human problem is the fundamental problem of philosophy, so he views man as the object in philosophical study to explain the real world of human.In the introduction of Critique of Dialectical Reason- Methodological Issues, published in 1960, Sartre raises the banner of Marxism, and claims that there are empty fields in Marxist Hominology, and then points out that people should use existentialist Hominology to fill up the empty fields of Marxist Hominology. This is Sartre’s "Empty Field of Hominology Theory" Basing on himself, Sartre combines Marxism with existentialist Hominology, and establishes a historical humanities, that is his historical humanities theory. The historical humanities theory is the philosophy theoretical foundation of the "Empty Field of Hominology Theory", and the humanities dialectics is research methods of the historical humanities theory. Sartre’s "Empty Field of Hominology Theory" mainly reflects his attitude towards Marxism, so the study of "Empty Field of Hominology Theory" is helpful for people to more deeply understand the real Marxism. In this thesis, the research about "Empty Field of Hominology Theory" is focused on its historical humanities theory and humanities dialectics. By comparing "Empty Field of Hominology Theory" with Marxist Hominology in the essence of human, the freedom of human, the practice of human, the tendency of the historical and the social development and so on, and also combine it with Chinese contemporary Hominology, the author get some valuable inspiration. more details is as follows:The first part is the historical background of Sartre’s "Empty Field of Hominology Theory" The author discussed it in two aspects, one is the social historical background and Sartre’s academic background, the other is the philosophical background.The second part is the contents of Sartre’s "Empty Field of Hominology Theory". This thesis mainly discusses the theoretical background of the "Empty Field of Hominology Theory"--historical humanities theory, and its the theoretical method-- humanities dialectics.The third part is the critique of Sartre’s "Empty Field of Hominology Theory" to Marxist humanics. Based on the comprehensive analysis about Sartre’s historical humanities theory and humanities dialectics, the author summarizes What the Sartre criticism to Marxist humanics mostly focusing on.The fourth part is the evaluation and analysis about Sartre’s "Empty Field of Hominology Theory". This thesis comments from the following two aspects:one is the comparative analysis between Sartre’s historical humanities and Marxist humanics; the other is comparative analysis between Sartre’s historical humanities and marxist historical materialism. The comparing content involves essence the essence of human, the freedom of human, the research method of Hominology, the practice of human, the tendency of the historical and the social development, and the objective law of the development and so on.