Research On Local Government Cooperation In Trans - Regional Joint Governance

Haze is probably the most serious environmental problem that our country is currently facing with. The importance and urgency of air pollution control is unprecedented prominence. It is a strong desire of the government to give everyone a beautiful environment. Although the State Council executive meeting has issued an air pollution control measure, local governments have also set a military order, air pollution is still facing great challenges, highlighting the problems of air pollution have shown regional characteristics. With the advance of urbanization, urban poverty development, increasing transmission between adjacent, urban effects of atmospheric pollution, severe haze adjacent areas appear strong correlation, it is impossible to rely solely on a single city to keep the air quality. That’s why explore breakthrough cross-regional joint administrative division views has been repeatedly raised.A number of CPPCC members suggested that the effective way to manage haze pollution is to seize its pollution source this year, the government, society and the joint efforts of polluting enterprises tripartite governance. Beijing, Tianjin and their surrounding areas are joint to establish emergency response system to control air pollution, the implementation of joint prevention and control rules have been enacted last year. However, the current policy of the proposed multi-theory or rule is based on foreign experience, which of course lack of scientific data as support. The top-level design should have a rational scientific data as support.In the western public management scholars to study public management issues using the experimental method has been widely recognized and accepted, but in our country, this is still a pending issue of development. Conservatives do not accept the view of behavioral economics, but also to reject its challenge to the "rational man". However, our study can not be confined to verify the theoretical cycle theory, there must be a scientific experiment to verify the theory. It is precisely match with this idea, we use experimental economics-based approach to study the problem of inter-regional public governance pollution.For a more realistic simulation of real-life situations, this paper based on the perspective of nested social dilemmas research, noted that regional cooperation in inter-regional differences in endowments have this phenomenon, in the design of experimental variables on the use of the initial endowment difference simulation. In the experimental design process, also take the problem of the rate of return for a small group and large group differences into account. This design is an innovation of this article.For the study of public goods experiments concentrated in a single public goods experiments, this paper based on the nested social dilemma perspective on cross-regional haze rule conduct joint research, not only broadens the experimental study in nested public goods aspects, but also more realistic which will give more accurate results. It was found that:(1) a single joint is better than cure haze urban governance;(2) relies on the spontaneous behavior of the joint urban governance can indeed produce a single effect tends to lower its cooperation; impact (3) differences in endowments bring depends cities size at the regional level. The main conclusions of this article, a joint inter-regional haze rule is not only feasible, and its cooperation is better than a single urban governance, the impact of differences in endowments brought depend on the regional context.This study will collaborate on introducing innovative methods of experimental economics in pollution across the region, through the rational design of experiments simulated real-life situations, to get the relevant data, one can verify the feasibility of the theory and experience, it can also provided by controlling the experimental variables in the time reference for policy design, but also to some extent fill the gaps in the experimental study of the social context in nested public goods has not yet appeared in the country, a rich endowment differences in the impact of the law on public goods contributions research.