A Study On The Causes Of Bad Attribution Of National Defense Students

National defense students is to train the army relying on local colleges and universities, the school underwent major course of study and military training, he was assigned to the military appointed reserve officer. At present, students of national defense education is developing rapidly, but the related research progress is slow, policies and regulations is not perfect, the management system is not perfect, leading to the existence of many problems in the process of cultivating national, defense students especially underachievement is becoming more and more serious, such as: low academic performance, serious fail, the lack of learning motivation, learning attitude is not correct, learningobjectives are not clear, the learning effect is not good, because the school does not meet was released, has become the realistic problem urgently to be solved in the work of the cultivation of national defense students. This paper takes a defense college students as the research object, on the basis of the absolute poor academic research object according to whether the definition will fail to LD group and excellent in their group, focus on learning disabilities ofthe national defense students academic achievement attribution, attribution analysis characteristics of LD national defense students academic achievement, the analysis of defense Underachievers in academic attribution demographic differences method, the analysis of academic excellent group (not fail) and learning disabilities group (fail one and above) in academic attribution style differences, and based on the statistical results, put forward to thee education and correction measures of underachievement students of national defense. The multi Attribution Scale (MMCS) academic achievements attribution subscales were evaluated by SPSS17.0analysis, results showed that:(1) the poor academic attribution in national defense students academic success and academic failure without sex, singleton differences;(2) the national defense students attribution in learning disabilities academic success and their failure to have differences of nationalities, regions, grades, academic level significantly;(3) the poor academic and academic excellent students of national defense national defense students ac ademic achievement attribution style had no significant difference, two groups in academic success attribution were successively to capability-luck situation,attribution in school the failure of all are hard situation of luck and ability. Excellent studies group internal control score higher than the poor academic group, control group were lower than those of the poor academic.