Discussions About System Reform Of Architectural Design Academy Attached To H University

As the deepening of the economic system reform, the establish of mordern enterprise system and the multi-investigated share system reform, the topic of system reform has now being the melody in the architectureral design field. The reform is proceeding in succession among most of the common engineering design unite. Some are just on their way, some even finished. In contrast, the academy-run civil engineering and architecture design institutes have fallen far behind the local enterprise in the course of the system reform. Why? Based on the case of H Architecture design institute, the writer discusses the system reform issue in the academy-run design unite, with the will to be a reference resource. The first part of this article includes the summary of H design institute, a comparison between the academy-run and the common design unite and also reviews the system reform progress in civil engineering and architecture design field. Then it sets forth how the civil engineering design enterprises were run in some other developed country and compares it with the domestic situations. The third part analyses the outer and inner surroundings of the case,makes it clear what should be solved during the reform. At last it discusses the steps of the reform and how to deal with the difficulties. At the same time, it puts forward measures to establish legal person control and management structure &share ownership structure. System reform related to the readjustment of benefit, including both the present and expected benefit. The academy-run enterprise is sluggish during the course of system reform, mostly dues to that different people take different attitudes to the regulations. The purpose of this article is to provide a useful reference material for the academy-run enterprise.