The Rationality Rresearch Of Game Theory

Game theory is also called countermeasures concerning, its mainly research is decision-making behavior in direct interaction occurs. how people making decisions and how to achieve a balanced this decision a problem. Game theory is the study of rational decision-makers conflict and cooperation between the theory. The game theory is in some situations in every right in deciding what action to take the strategy, when purposefully act, he considering his decision-making behavior for others, and others may affect the behavior to his may affect, by selecting the best action plan to seek gain or utility maximization. So in this paper through game theory in rational people decisions to study its made that decision is under what conditions, and analyze the thought up the idea and decision whether reasonable a process.This article mainly from the Angle of philosophy to demonstrate the rationality of game theory problems, this game theory of rationality in the process of analyzing mainly points to the three questions as follows:The first one is the rationality of Nash equilibrium, the rationality of the Nash equilibrium in his final game theory into the practice of the rationality of moral rationality, namely, to establish whether the rationality of Nash equilibrium solution of rationality or Nash negotiations both of these questions can be attributed to a problem as the above is moral rationality, he said we rational decision-making rationality, Nash equilibrium is cannot solve many problems, because the rationality of the theory of nano equilibrium theory of rational person assumptions in the final analysis, it is moral problems, this rational rationality, Nash equilibrium for completely cannot solve this problem is moral rationality of key. Nash theory of the rationality is ultimately? Finally is actually moral rationality. Game theory of typical models:prisoners' dilemma of problem root knot in what place? The problem is that the individual rationality in the pursuit of their own benefit to maximization when he is a what? It is itself relies on his spontaneous interest, but the spontaneous such a balance he could not reach collective optimal, namely we in real life the individual benefit the optimal is not equal to the interests of the collective optimal, Nash equilibrium is mainly to explore the optimal collective interests, but the collective optimal collective rationality of rational decision also met prisoners predicament existed among a basic problem, what problem? This question to collective interests optimal, must want to have a moral framework, want to have a social justice and social norms in it. Like you and me, two prisoner dilemma, the two of us if belong to keep bare-foot see who get optimal, but the problem is that if a man does not comply with such a to keep bare-foot problem, he's collective optimal is impossible, so he in this inside the problems they faced, and actually Nash in solving the problem faced by the same when the greatest difficulty is rational choice facing moral rationality.The second problem is the moral rationality that must ensure the information intact, in the information symmetry with asymmetric information under the conditions of the moral rationality, the second theory was written such a moral rationality his ultimate realization depends on us for overall information mastered degree, the place like this into information complete rationality. Then front ethics and information complete rationality of ideal to last for a variety of reasons is impossible to completely do, but such is analyzed theoretically analyzed. These two rationality are built in our on countermeasures rational analysis of static analysis above, he was not able to reflect the social and cultural changes or is the background of state countermeasures decision-maker, could not fully reflect, so it needs us to change from static analysis of dynamic analysis model of evolutionary game theory went up namely rationality. And the rationality of evolutionary game theory is eradicate market situation, according to the social culture changing conditions to adjust the policymakers his behavior, so as to analyze the evolution process of a process is reasonable. In the historical evolution of social and cultural changes in the conditions within this condition ultimately depends on the rationality of evolutionary game theory.The third problem is the rationality of evolutionary game theory. Front of two rationality are based on our rational analysis of countermeasures of static analysis perspective research, he could not fully reflect the social and cultural changes or is the decision-maker's background state, so it needs us to change from static analysis of dynamic analysis model of evolutionary game theory went up research rationality problem. And evolutionary game theory of rationality is abandoned completely rational hypotheses, starting from the theory of group behavior, the adjustment process is seen as a dynamic system, behavior corpus was assumed to be programmed to adopt a set behavior, it for economic law or a successful behavior rule, behavior strategy of knowledge is in the process of evolution has been continuously revised and improved, a successful strategy to imitate, therefore cause out some general "rules" and "system" as behavior subject action standards. In these general rule, behavior corpus obtain "satisfied" benefits. The market situation, according to the need for social and cultural changes of the conditions of this decision makers to adjust act, to analyze the evolution process of a process is reasonable. In the historical evolution process, social and cultural changes in the conditions within this condition ultimately depends on the rationality of evolutionary game theory.