| China's coal production safety in recent years aroused wide concern in society, our Government, through the reform of the mechanism of safety supervision and enhance safe production supervision, although the safe production of coal in recent years has been to some extent improved, but China's coal industry is still more serious safety issues, which to some extent with the safety of the current regulatory system of coal are not unrelated, in the current management system of local government as the direct supervision of the coal side security issues, with and the central government to pursue different goals, and different ownership structure of enterprises is the purpose of local government an important way to achieve their own, so the central government emphasizes security issues, local government efforts to result after the central government often requires The difference, of the ownership structure of China's coal industry had an impact.In this paper we analyze the impact of safety regulations under the System of coal enterprises invest factors of production safety, and on enterprises of different ownership structures on the difference between safety investments were analyzed, and different regulatory system, the Government has changed the method performance enterprise security discussion In the final analysis of the current delegate supervision of the Central Government under the system of assessment indicators is how changes in local government structure of the coal industry, changes in ownership.Through this paper, it tells us when the central government to local governments in the coal industry, a change in the assessment indicators, local governments often take advantage of the new assessment targets are difficult to observe the opportunity for their own profit, and profit is the way controlled by the local government owned coal mines, which leads to changes in ownership structure. According to the specific case of the coal industry in Shanxi Province, we are "the country back into" the phenomenon of change in the ownership structure was further analyzed and corresponding policy recommendations. |