China And South Korea's Agricultural Support System Research

Agricultural supports under the market economy, is a economic problems faced by the researchers and policy makers all over the word, especially in today's global food shortages, the position of agriculture and a weak industry characteristics determine the agriculture should be supported. China is a populous country, and also a large agricultural country, the development of agriculture related to the operation of the entire national economy. For a long time in China, agricultural makes up the industry development model allows the low level of agricultural support and inefficient, the pressure of reform inefficient agricultural support is increasing, the current promotion of rural development and increase their income, need a strong agricultural support policies. However, there are a large number of problems in the process of agriculture supports, such as inadequate agricultural support, agricultural support measures in inefficient and irrational structure of agricultural support policies and so on, so, establish and improve the reasonable agricultural support system is also a serious problem.South Korean is selected for comparison study. Although China and South Korea are different in political and cultural tradition, the stage and level of economic development have a huge difference, but for any one industry, although at different stages of development will vary, but the main is the same law of development or Similarly, South Korea's successful development of agriculture to give us a model for reference, in our limited financial circumstances, the optimal support structure, stable source of funding, changing forms of support, strengthen financial support and so on, is to improve the efficiency of viable agricultural support Choice.Paper to elaborate on agricultural support in the basic theory and further improve the system of agricultural support on the basis of objective necessity, the first use of economic theory and data related to the scale of agricultural support China and Korea, support and other aspects of economic analysis, And then further use of econometric analysis and comparative research methods to finance agricultural support China and South Korea and other aspects of the internal structure of the empirical analysis.Government, as the investors for the provision of agricultural public goods and services, to support the agricultural sector as the current support of the dominant mode of agricultural finance is necessary and effective. Support in agricultural policy, the mainly measures taken by China are: the price intervention, financial subsidies, credit support and legal protection, which is also South Korea and the world's major practices in other developed countries, but the main problems in the development of China's agricultural policy The lag, and agricultural policy can not be in accordance with national conditions at different stages of adjustments and continuous evolution. Of support in agricultural inputs, to state the current level of support is concerned, the absolute size of agricultural support are on the rise and the relative size of the stage, but in comparison with South Korea, both support and fund utilization efficiency are some gaps. Empirical studies have shown that investment in support of the absolute size of the steady growth is inevitable, to support the use of funds structure is not reasonable, and the existing terms of financial expenditure management system's many problems is the financial support of agricultural inputs of the main reasons for inefficient use of funds. Direct income subsidies, price support than the circulation more efficient way of principle, and also increase their income directly.Finally, how to improve agricultural support system and improve the financial efficiency of agricultural support policies proposed by the corresponding recommendations: First, increase the government's financial investment in agriculture, adjusting the structure of fiscal expenditure, investment in agriculture, increase agricultural infrastructure and Support for agricultural science and technology; Secondly, to improve agricultural price support measures; Third, deepen reform and standardize the management of agricultural support policies to improve the operational efficiency of agricultural support policies; Fourth, establish support legal system.