Improving The System Of Analysis Of The Property Income Of Rural Residents

In this paper, introduction, first right of property income and property income and farmers are defined, and the definition of income for farmers and property exist in the current controversial issues were discussed. The property after the income increase for farmers to improve the impact of China's economy is analyzed and discussed, results show that the appropriate property, income increase will improve the lives of the Chinese people will certainly help, but the excessive increase of property income also lead to social wealth distribution and inequality. Only by improving the income and property of the relevant system in order to improve the current unequal distribution of income and property issues.. However, because of what system, it is not yet a clear academic definition. This paper then the system defines the concept of boundaries. Because the system's core principles of economics, Coase Theorem is also currently in the academic community there is a big controversy, the Coase Theorem itself, the conditions can be achieved relatively harsh in dealing with real issues as people may not be perceived as negotiating parties can truly achieve the so-called Pareto optimization. Therefore, this article the definition of the system is not just limited to the Coase Theorem and the North against the system definition. But through property rights and clear way to address the externalities caused by the two sides of the issue of the dispute, does the subsequent system design and system played a role in promoting innovation. Is to the science rigorous manner, this article is only restricted in system's definition in the political constitution system the significance, namely the major part institutional arrangements, the institutional innovations and the system vicissitude originate from Government department's promotion effect, but is not because farmer negotiate reduces the transaction cost the behavior. But the property right defined system, takes the institutional arrangements and the system design one kind of pattern, will still be applied this article in the analysis.In the second part of this paper, through the "China Statistical Yearbook" of the relevant data and the use of related data tables and graphical analysis, in contrast to recent years the situation of urban and rural income and property income urban and rural residents after the situation. Come to the conclusion that, as a result of differences in per capita income inequality and other factors led to the present income of urban and rural income polarization difference. Property income peasants and urban residents compared to property income is not only low incomes but also because a number of institutional factors that hinder the income of peasants, especially the possibility of increased property income. Only by improving the income distribution system related to urban-rural income gap and thus improves the ease of rural property income of the grave situation. Based on this reason, this article analyzed in the following sections Rural Property with relevant laws and regulations. revenue system and the system factors in these systems the problems, and in the following discussion of the issues raised against the corresponding policy of recommendations for improvement. In the fourth part, the paper first through the establishment of property income and rural consumption between the mathematical model, measure the income of peasants increased the possibility of impact on consumption and make the corresponding empirical analysis. Using the system variables and then measure how the system to enhance the response of property income.In the method, this paper documents inspection law was passed, "China Statistical Yearbook" first analyzed the situation of the property income of Chinese residents and property income of rural residents and characteristics of the present conditions, then from a system point of view of the property income of rural residents in problems. Mathematical model established through the use of the method, focusing on the perspective from the mathematical model, the first analysis of property income in adding this new income distribution system, the residents of the intertemporal consumption decision-making behavior and labor supply situation. The results show that the increase in property income residents help to increase their consumption levels, but reduced the labor supply of farmers. In addition, if institutional arrangements can not be effectively bound to increase over the property income growth would have serious adverse consequences. In this paper, then model the system by establishing a system of property income of the farmers were analyzed. The results showed that only institutional arrangements will be designed in a reasonable area to help farmers property income of more rapid growth. Through a combination of text analysis and mathematical logic part of the proof of the results of the income of rural property, improvement of the system path is discussed, and corresponding policy recommendations.Innovation of this paper is from a system point of view of income of rural property related issues, and trying to build mathematical model for this problem mathematical explanation. Shortcomings and inadequacies of the mathematical model is given by a system of endogenous variables of the constraints, and therefore can not very well that in the end the system which increase farmers income from property in the dynamic process played a crucial role. And also, more deeply research in this area need to do more work to explore and discuss in future.