| Summary Tibet since the 13th century belonging to the territory of the Yuan dynasty and become an inalienable part of Chinese territory. Tibet has been a member of China under the jurisdiction of the Central Government, hundreds of years all over the Tibetan and the national work together to safeguard the motherland's reunification and territorial integrity of States. But since the 17th century, due to the special geographical location, the unique history, the culture of Tibet, natural resources, it became one of the most important places of the imperialist powers'rivalry. Since the beginning of the Qing Dynasty in the activities of imperialist aggression against China's Tibet, United Kingdom played a very important role, it can be said that imperialist aggression against Tibet, mainly United Kingdom aggression.Full text in four chapters:Chapter one:major described the United Kingdom early on reservoir permeability of policy formation and implementation, and bankruptcy. Including the United Kingdom the Himalayan countries of aggression, twice to meddle in Nepal unification wars, armed intervention on Chek Lap Kok in Bhutan·Bekhar management, as well as in the Gorkha war of aggression against Tibet United Kingdom conspiracy. Chapter two:Describing 19,20 century United Kingdom "the East India Company" and the British-Indian Governor, Hasiting (Warren.Hastings) trade on China's Tibet attempted conspiracy and invasion of Tibet, United Kingdom on Tibetan suspension of direct contact. Main contents include:United Kingdom spy George Bogle (George Bogle) Tibetan and TE NIE (Samuel Turner) mission, and Manning (Thomas Manning) aggression.Chapter three:Curzon, Marquess are described (GeorgeNathanielCurzon) and Younghusband (Younghusband) "times": the United Kingdom during the armed aggression against China's Tibet. Main contents include:war of aggression against Tibet processes and results for the first time, the second war of aggression against Tibet process and the outcome.Chapter four:objective evaluation Qing United Kingdom in the history of aggression against China in Tibet policy at all stages in the process, through different stages in their analysis of the results of the implementation of different policies, arrive at substantive conclusions about policy.From form to see quarter United Kingdom on Tibet of policy in early is used "missionary", subsequently take sent missions to Tibet "traveled", and "trading" to last take directly aggression means up its purpose; from each stage of way derived out of each stage by to reached of directly purpose view, early is craving reached spirit penetration of purpose, subsequently is sought directly exchanges, then later is is armed aggression. From the United Kingdom early on reservoir permeability of policy formation (to missionaries for their pilot) to the early implementation of reservoir permeability policy (United Kingdom aggression Himalayan country), and then to the British and Indian hashing, developed by the Governor to Tibet (mission to Tibet) to the bandits Song period of its armed aggression against China's Tibet, each with different performance modes and different specific purposes. United Kingdom's policy on Tibet is changing, but there is a continuous aspect, nature has its side, regardless of the form, how to change the policy, and, essentially unchanged, nature has only one, that is, United Kingdom and the Government of British India to maximize the benefits of, Tibet into China United Kingdom preset orbit with the British Indian Government. United Kingdom series of aggression against China's Tibet and activities to split the plot, to the relations between China and Tibet and China and India have very bad effects and consequences of the relationship between the two countries.So far, although academic circles on the United Kingdom and Tibet has many research results, but most of them mainly focus on the United Kingdom on the study on the invasion of Tibet by force. Comparison has effect of monograph has Yang Gongsu of China Against Foreign Aggression Interference Tibet Local Struggle History, and Qing Quarter United Kingdom Aggression Tibet history, papers main include Sun Hongnian of "20th Century Early United Kingdom on Tibet of Aggression and Tibet Built Province Problem Research" (Tibet research. 2003.04) and Hu yan of "Curzon, Marquess Memorandum and Republic Early United Kingdom Aggression China Tibet of Policy" (China Tibetan studies.1998.03),Wu Kunming of "Revolution Hou United Kingdom Split China Tibet of New Policy" (China Tibetan studies.1998.02) and the Song Chunyan of "United Kingdom Aggression China Tibet Process in the Into reservoir Backbone Elements of Activities and Effect (1904-1937)" (Northeast Normal University Journal,2005.05),etc.For this aspects of related research also has Sun Hongnian of "Simla Meeting Before and After Domestic of Treatment Reservoir Policy and Effect---to in the British Reservoir Thing Representations for Center" (Tibet research under.2009.02), and Du Yongbing of "Modern United Kingdom Meddling in China Tibet of Three Name Representative Character---Rong Hepeng, and Bell, and Hugh Richardson" (Tibet nationalities Journal of under social science version.1998.01), and Xu Guangzhi of "Discussion on Western Colonialism Who Early on Tibet of Penetration and Aggression activities" (Tibet University Journal of under. 2004.09), and Li Luxian, and beam stiff Thai of "United Kingdom Interference Tibet of Different History Stage and the Features" (Tibet research under.1997.04), and Benjamin Xu, and Xie Zhong of "On the 18th Century Late United Kingdom on China Tibet of Penetration Policy and Bankruptcy" (Hunan Technology University Journal of (social science version) under.2005.09).This paper is intended to reference the predecessors on the basis of research results, through literature research, demonstration, and other methods, combined with the research on Qing Dynasty Tibetan British people and the activities in question, further in-depth study, which revealed the Qing United Kingdom policy change on Tibet and real, and come to objective conclusions. At the same time, I hope that through research related issues, the entire Tibetan Studies in the history of play to the role of a catalyst. |
PDF Full Text Request