Interpretation Of Heidegger, "critique Of Pure Reason" Phenomenon

Heidegeer is one of the most important philosophers in the 20th centuryand he is a1so a creative phi1osopher. In our nation, the investigation ofHeidegger's thoughts has lasted fOr many years. But the relation betweenHidegger's and Kaknt's thoughts has been ignored. Heidegger allachedimportance to Kant's Critique Of Pure Reason, and his interpretation was ledby his phenomenological method. This thesis is about this theme.The thesis includes three chaPters.The first chapter discusses why Heidegger attached importance to CriliqueOf Pure Reason. Heidegger thought that his representative wnrk Being andDme was misread. Thiough his interpretation to critique Of Pure Reason, henot only cleared uP the misunderstanding, but also p1aced his thoughts into thehistory of Philosophy.The second chaPter discusses how Heidegger proved his own philosophythrough the interpreation to Crtique Of Pure Reason. For Heideggel;phenomenology signified a metho1ogical concept. It means to let which showsitself be seen from itself in the very way in which it shows itse1f from itse1fSo he thought that the essence of metaphysics determines that it is not aboutthe science of experience b11t the science of knowledge a priori or theontology of being. So the Critique Of' Pure Reason is not the theory ofknow1edge, but the theory of being. The fUndamenta1 ontology of Dasein laysfOundation for the ontic science. For the being is a1ways the temPoral beingthe time becomes the emphasis of Heidegger's interpretation.For Kant, time is the form of pure intuition and the formal a prioricondition of al1 aPpearances. All thoughts are directed to intuition. This is the1imitation of hUInan beings. On the other hand, time is the root of sensibilityand understanding. So the categories of understanding also come from the3time. In order to attain categories, Kaflt put three synthesizes into practice ---the synthesis of aPprehension in intuition, the synthesis of reproduction inimagination and the synthesis of recognition in a concept. Heidegger thoughtthose three synthesizes corresponded to the three-dimension of time -- thenoW the no~longer now and the earlier-right now. Because Heideggeremphasized the pre-onto1ogical knowledge (the un-objected understanding oftoo1s in using them), the contents in concepts were the things we first put intothem. So the Heidegger's time e1apses from earlier-right now to no-1ongernow thIough now. Through this way, the meaning of being is conceived. Thetime opens a horizon fOr being before hand. Being canLnot be grasped expectby taking time into consideration.The third chaPter discusses the significance of Heidegger's interpretation.Heidegger's interpretation is a good way to understand the philosophy ofHeidegger's and Kant's. And it a1so has enlighten-ment to understand thephi1osophy itself Heidegger used tWo ways to interpret Crilique Of PureReason. One way was that he regarded Crilique Of Pure Reason as aphilosophical context, the other was that he regarded 'Critique of PureReason' as a philosophical activity. The thIee aims of his interpretation were f1) an exan1ination of Crilique Of Pure Reason; 2) an introduction into thebasic problems of phiIosophy; 3) a specia1 exercise in the actua1 phi1osophicalinvestigations.ThIough Heidegger's interpretation, we can clearly comprehend that thedevelopment of phi1osophy must lay foundation in the predecessor's works.ThIough previously discussion, the author thinks the orientation ofphi1osophyis a conviction in the socia1 practices and the theme of future philosophy is thesocial life.