.1927-1937 The Nationalist Government Of The Tibetan Policy

The study focusing on the policy to Tibet, where the special culture, tradition, geography, religion, history and social life style is distinguish from other regions, during Nanjing Nationalist Government, is a hot point in today's academic circles, many scholars view from different research vision and let a hundred flowers blossom, let a hundred schools contend. In this thesis, the author attempts to emphasize the important period, from 1927 to 1937. Attention is paid close to key issues. Re-studying and evaluating the policy, the author analyzes the significance and limitation of the policy, and confirms existence and realistic response of history, There are three chapters to express the opinion in this article.The first chapter mainly states the critical situation, which the national government at the beginning of establishment faced, and the development of Tibet, such as politics, economy and social state, and the conflicts between Tibet and the Central Government, emphasizes the importance of objective elements during the process of making and adjusting the policy. Under the difficult circumstances, how to solve the emergency accidents and affirm the original principle is the remarkable feature of the policy in this stage.The second chapter touches on the relatively steady and positive policy of the national government how to adopt the most equitablesettlement of the issues between the two sides. It is the key content in this article. Practice and operation in the important historical issues mainly includes those aspects: setting up the organization in the administrative frame, seeking the effective way to solve the problem actively, supporting the ninth Pna Chen returning Tibet with effective measures, dispatching HuangMusong to Tibet to hold a memorial ceremony after the 13thTa Le Bla Ma parinirvana. Huang consulted with the important officers in Tibet. Perceiving and considering the policy carefully, we can assess his efforts providing the realistic and objective basis of the next steps.In the third chapter, the author sets forth the view of the policy, appraises the policy objectively and justly, dialectically rather than pays more attention to the fixed factors. Reconsidering the significance and the effects of the policy is the main purpose because it will benefit the development of both sides in the future and give us reference to formulating more reasonable policy.The author analyzes the policy from the viewpoint of history to explain the value and the negative aspects, and put forward own opinion that the policy in this period plays an important role in the history.