Students Coping Hypnosis Intervention Study

Students are in the acceleration growth of physical and mental, mental development has not fully mature yet. While facing for the study, love, and employment of the various pressures, self-control is not strong, there are often inner contradictions and conflicts, if the student used an inappropriate way to respond to the rapid expansion of the negative impact, this may bring about negative psychological experience, it will be psychological barriers to physical and mental harm, leading to serious consequences. Therefore, what kind of coping styles the formation of university students to take can minimize the negative impact, which kind of intervention we should take can avoid their physical and mental damage, which can enhance its mental health capacity has become the education and psychology areas'common concern. While the previous studies deal with more in the way of research, few studies are based on response to intervention in group counseling consciousness manner, intervention model is very single, so this study attempts to pass a large sample survey methods to understand the characteristics of coping style about students at this stage, and then through a specific experimental intervention (group hypnotic intervention, general groups), by comparing group counseling and group counseling hypnosis to see which dimensions of the therapeutic effect is better, this can enrich the way of intervention model, and also this experiment can provide practical basis for intervention in coping styles.In this study, the following conclusions can be drawn:(1) the students'use of frequency of coping style from high to low were: to solve problems, searching-help, retreat, fantasy, rationalization, self-blame; the use of mature coping styles accounted for 51%, the use of immature coping styles accounted for 49%;(2) There is significant gender difference in the factor of searching-help, boys who choose to searching-help coping styles are more than girls; there is extremely significant difference between undergraduate students and tertiary institutions students in solving the problem, undergraduate college students inclined to choose to solve the problem of this coping style;(3) there is extremely significant differences between the child and non-child in problem-solving, self-blame , there are also differences in fantasy, retreat, rationalizing ,so when they face for problems, one-child tend to choose the problem-solving coping style , while the child tend to choose self-blame, fantasy, retreat, and rationalization of coping styles. Group of students in urban areas than rural groups easier for students to choose fantasy coping style;(4) There is significant difference among different grades of university students, the first and second grade students attend to choose self-blame coping style compared to the third and fourth grade students. The coping styles among different grades are different. while grade is increasing, the use of mature coping is increasing too, the immature coping styles showed decreasing tendency, but the graduating class of university students appeared to use much immature coping styles more than mature coping styles;(5) Before the intervention, there is no difference between the experimental group and control group; while after the intervention, all the factors of experimental group have been improved. Some of the factors of control group have been improved too. Intervention effect that the hypnosis group got is much pronounced than the general group.(6) three months later, the investigation on experimental group still has a good prognosis for effect, although there was no difference between the post-test and the follow-up post-test of control group, while the mature coping styles showed drop trend, immature must be upward.