Quantitative Studies Of International Economic Law

As we all know, we now confront a new epoch of 2000,with the great development of our economic and society. Twenty years ago, it is very hard to believe that law which contains culture moral personal-relationship and marriage can be analyzed by math and game theory. With the emerge of a new school of society analysis in law, we begin to gear our sight to such new opinion that law, in some extent, can be lighted by not only math and game theory but also by the economic ideas, although this kinds of measures have already been introduced to economy research 200 years ago.Quantification is now introduced to our Chinese expert in international economic law. The first part of this paper is on the creed of quantification. Quantification is based on such creed that: We need to do differential coefficient in law firstly and then finish our analysis by integral. We need to know the effect of law on particular person firstly and then we can summarize all the effect of law through our statistic in a concise matrix. For example, we have two players and each players have two choice under the legal system. The two choices are on line and cross separately. Then we get a matrix ofThe effect of game theory and quantification is to concise a complex thing to a simple statistic of strategies, which can be analyzed by game theory.The second part of this paper is on the new concept of international economic law and its basic principle. I suggest that there are many dissensions on the concept of international law. For example, professor Mei Zheng Yao suggest that international economic law is on the international economic relationship in international society and international exchange business and trade of each countries. But professor An Chen preach that international economic law is on the transnational private and public business of common persons or governments. So it is very hard for me to give a precise concept on international economic law here. But one thing I emphasis here is that no matter what international economic law is it, it have to contain the intention to control the exchange of resource and wealth. The law which contains the intention to give a efficient way to sign contract and exchange goods is belong to civil law and commercial law.The third part of my paper is on reducing the regulation of government and its breaches. This idea has already been established in America 20 years ago, but in China, it is very hard for our people to believe that we can reduce and should reduce the regulation of our government. In this part I lay out five reasons to support my idea. First, foreign trade surrogate, based upon the game theory of Morris, who got Nobel price by this game theory idea is proved to be inefficient. Second, public choice theory can be used to analyze government. Third, quota and rent-seeking theory. Forth, tariff and WTO. In this sect, I try my best to introduce a new idea to reader that tariff is not so good itself, ecause it reduce the resource and wealth of whole world. Fifth, the micronization of each government. In my opinion, each government is not only a whole integral part but also an object which consisted by each officeholder. In this object, each officeholder is inevitably involved into the game theory competence with his higher-up and his electorate.The forth part of my paper is on game theory on analyzing international economic law. First, MFN theory has new function. Second, WTO and international environmental protection.Third, subsidy and its legal thinking. Forth, transparence and its function on WTO. Fifth, game theory on retaliate.To sum up, the whole part of my paper is on these ideas that we can understand legal research on international economic law more by lay them on quantification.