Marx World History And Contemporary Globalization

As for the process that Max thought develops, it has absorbed predominate thought, and has criticized. Engels said:"As a specially appointed field in the division of work, the philosophy in every times is on the premise of that its pioneer gives it specially appointed thought and the thought is the start."At the same time, Max has important thought sources, as well as the certain background characteristic of times to the exploration to world history theory.Economic globalization has been an issue for the home and abroad theory boundary. From different angles and in the different methods, we can get different results. A few west scholars think that economic globalization is just a transformation into capitalism. To realize the integration of capitalism, capitalism is trying to remove the socialism states already existing by globalization. Also there are scholars think that the globalization isn't equal to as much as transformation into capitalism or Westerism. Globalization is beneficial to socialism. The stress does not depend on acceptance or denies to these viewpoints, but depends on how to fix positions, decide the nature. The essay thinks that Max's theory and method on the development of human society is the base of globalization problem. The Development situation of Human beings'basic contradiction and realization form are basis of above-mentioned problems.In all, we are different from initiators, not in whether to admit that the body of economic globalization is capital, but in whether it has the history rationality or eternal rationality (whether to be exceeded or be unified). The attitudes that we can hold are: Analyzing its inherent contradiction, controlling it reasonably, obeying blind. The upper divergence of viewpoint lies in the difference on positions, theories and methods. In the theory, the initiators Globalization theory fails to see inner contradictions in economic globalization, so it is possible to seek the basis to exceed. However, Max's theory about world and history is different. It is not affirmative to extant directness, but in the certainty found themselves in the negative factors from the rationality of history found in the history of irrationality, and in the practice of reform.