Causes Of Administrative Accountability Perform Block Analysis

Administrative accountability of political civilization in China an integral part of building a responsible government, rule of law, government, democratic government in an important way. The internal demand is generated by the elected and appointed officials must be accountable to the people, must act on their words and take responsibility, to strengthen and clear responsibilities of government officials to improve administrative efficiency. China to promote accountability, it is against the long-standing responsibility of the Government Management deletion and the chronic lack of accountability mechanisms initiated in an attempt to citizen participation in the power and authority of the rule of law official clearance, purged Official.In order to strengthen the executive authorities and their civil servants and the people contact, to achieve administrative law, regulate the exercise of administrative power correctly, the current government a high degree of concern and work to promote administrative accountability. Premier Wen Jiabao, the central government for the first time in the new conference on the Independent Commission Against that, to "accelerate the focus on the implementation of the Chief Executives of administrative accountability and performance management system. Take administrative omission, arbitrary and severe damage to people's interests as such acts as the focus of accountability." In the April 2,2008 released "The main points of the State Council in 2008", the administrative accountability system or angry. May 2008, "the State Council on strengthening the city's decision to the county government according to law", the more emphasis to speed up the implementation of the accountability system. As the Government attaches great importance to the public extremely concerned about administrative accountability, has suffered a lot in the implementation of the obstacles, both the Government and public administration accountable for results and are not satisfied, then what are the factors which led to the implementation of administrative accountability block? In this paper, four dimensions for analysis and elaboration. First, the administrative accountability system encountered difficulties. Accountability abstract, fuzzy, poor maneuverability; accountability system and other system conflict, the contradiction between the party and the government has resigned and the contradiction between constitutional democracy; accountability lead to negative effects (externalities).Second, accountability mechanisms irrational, political composition, social and media pressure, the causal chain is difficult to lock, accountability relief gaps and other factors, to define the responsibilities and difficulties.Third, the accountability of the main purposes in the country, with the main body of accountability, including superior and executive leadership, supervision and auditing bodies, including the main variant of accountability at all levels of People's Congress, the CPC, democratic parties, the judiciary, news media, public, third sector organizations. However, the long accumulation of contradictions in the system of administrative organization, and the subjective role of party and government leaders to make the accountability of the main restrictive practice in accountability. Configuration issues such as power, emotional, arbitrary accountability occur, poor political culture psychology, the same body of the obstacles to accountability.Fourth, the object in terms of accountability, to be held accountable as a party to object to bear negative results accountability. Since there is accountability after punishment, treatment results can be expected, then the context of accountability, accountability of the core logic of the object must be reduced or exempted from liability, that is, to become the first choice to avoid responsibility. Such as attributing responsibility to the external environment, consciously or not satisfied with a fair and take action to hinder accountability, to illegal means, fuzzy responsible use of information superiority.