| General technology curriculum as a newly-created required course in the latest round of senior school curriculum reform.Under the advocate of "more than a standard" in this round of curriculum reform, a total of four press in our country published four versions of ordinary high school general technology curriculum according to the "technological course standard of general high school (experiment)". Those are Jiangsu education edition Henan science and technology, guangdong technology, geological section four sets of teaching materials. Although the four versions of the teaching materials are from the same curriculum standard, but still there are many differences. Making a comparison between different versions of the teaching material is conducive to promoting the authors revised the teaching material of teaching material, offering reference basis for the majority of teachers chose teaching materials.The author chose jiangsu and guangdong two versions of the edition of teaching materials which is used more widely in the domestic general technology curriculum, and chose compulsory module of the two versions as the research object, with middle of the basic psychological characteristics of school students and nature of general technology curriculum as the theory, literature research comparison and statistics as the main research methods, from the characteristics of the teaching material content, teaching material structure, the corresponding specific content three aspects has carried on the comparative study.The the characteristics of the teaching material content is compared from the teaching material content of the scientific correctness, the embodiment of the modernization, the embodiment of the elastic, and undertake to the student STSL education compares four dimensions. And the conclusion is that the content of the two versions meets the lesson mark requirements and comply with the concept of new curriculum reform. By contrast Jiangsu edition textbook present way diversification, the content of the reserved larger learning space for students.The teaching material structural system is compared from organizational structure and knowledge structure.The organizational structure ofJiangsu edition is detailed, newly in the column style and the frequency of each column was significantly higher,and the amount and type of problem sets are more. It is different The two versions in the presentation sequence of knowledge on the requirements of individual knowledge.The comparison of specific corresponding section is compared from the content structure, accounted for the proportion of this volume, the logic of teaching material content, the introduction of similar knowledge,chapter continuity, the degree of penetration STSL education, chapter introduction and so on. It shows the advantages and disadvantages of the two versions of textbooks.At the end of the article, firstly put forward the following suggestions for the writing of the textbook:knowledge should be broad, shallow depth, make the teaching material more interesting, in an effort to replace the text inseparable, pay attention to the development of scientific literacy, the teaching material content should be close to the student life.Secondly put forward the proposal for teachers to actively participate in the general technology teaching material in the research and evaluation, developing school-based general technology curriculum, to adjust measures to local conditions the choice of teaching material. And at the end of the article points out the short comings of this study:This study selected only two versions of the compulsory part of the teaching, research face is not wide enough. Only from the content of the characteristics, structure, corresponding to the specific content of the three dimensions of comparison, the follow-up may also be interested scholars from difficult materials, and curriculum standards, such as the degree of matching dimensions of comprehensive comparative study of the system to other versions of textbooks. |
PDF Full Text Request