Critical Public Areas Of Perspective Under The Urban Community Council Of Research

Since the mid-1980s, China's end "system of units of the social networking set out to the urban community's infrastructure. In the 1990s, the Government and society to focus on the urban community of public services and public facilities. With nearly 20 years of development and increasing the quality of the people, the beginning of the century the city community in China to focus on the urban community of autonomy. Community democracy has become in recent years, the Chinese Government Administration advocated form of democracy. Nationwide launched many pilot community try various public opinion gathering of channels and platforms, was anxious for a new way to listen to public opinion and develop the country. So a Community Conference, democracy forum, meeting and Chamber, and so on, trying to act as a grassroots, autonomous democratic decision-making body, the urban community, the role of the decision-making group. But these agencies are not really came to mind, is not valid and accurate rally public opinion. Representatives of public opinion is still happening.This article is intended to pass from the criticism of the public domain of disintegration and rebuild the equal right of speech angle for the study of the functioning of our urban community Council. How to leverage Community Council this platform for effective democratic public decisions this article focus and difficulties. Community Council to implement its democratic decision-making functions must be able to let the community public and rationally discuss Community public affairs, a democratic consultation findings community public policy. This is in line with Habermas's criticism of his in the public domain. Therefore, this article to criticism of the theory, through criticism of public domain perspective and some real-life case studies to analyze our urban community Council of running total. Criticism of the public domain is the publicity and critical. In the Community Council on this platform is community participation in the community public policy discourse. This article is in the community of difficulties in the Council decision of how to exercise of rights by equal discourse, real rally and reflect public opinion, the implementation of community residents to participate in public affairs community, not because they are a minority. Criticism from the reconstruction of public sphere theory analysis of the urban community Council of operational requirements with publicity and critical dual-from attribute, the also examines urban community Council on running programs in really wide rally public opinion, an accurate representation of the public opinion, monitoring the implementation of democratic decision-making, community residents of the exercise of the right of speech is protected. Can the construction of community-level democratic institutions, promote community democracy into more science more efficient.