The Comparative Study Of Japanese And Chinese Compound Vrebs-The [V+V] Type Compound Vrebs As The Center

Niimi(1987) pointed out that Japanese like comprehensive, intuitively to feel and express a thing, so compound verbs that can express specific action and state of things not only quantity is abounded but also frequently used in each style of articles. In fact, two verbs is merged into a compound verbs, which can express language effect that a single verb can not express, compound verbs make not only express become more concise, and make more vivid description. According to Morita(1994)'s investigation, modern Japanese verbs'40% are compound verbs. Indeed, if Japanese learners want to use Japanese agilely, then to grasp the structure and meaning compound verbs is very necessary. Conversely, if you can't skillfully use compound verbs, that understand Japanese native speakers who used Japanese in daily life can produce the obstacles. Based on this, the author finds the<Japanese and Chinese dictionary of double solution learning> and<the dictionary of crown Japan-China>[V1+V2] in advance of composite verbs, based on the study of the further investigation to observe the relationship between before and after primary elements.Through the survey, we found generally speaking Japanese's compound verbs in the combination is simpler, easier than the Chinese language to understand. For example, the number of Japanese which appears at the first eight compound verbs in the preceding paragraph elements,[V1+V2] of the compound verbs is 30.76%, but Chinese language for the first eight is only 13.47%; And which appears at the first eight times in the last components of the compound verbs is 36.50%,but Chinese language is relatively difficult to summarize, maybe because of the excessive number, and over dispersed. Through the study, the significance of a relationship before elements can be divided into①parallel relationship②modified and be modified relationship③be modified and modified relationship④escapes relationship. From the four types of comparative analysis we can see①in the two subject relationship, Japanese is not typical, but Chinese language is relatively rich, which can proof the Japanese to follow a elements that before and after the consistency principle, Chinese language don't have the restrictions;②the Japanese does not exist the compound verbs of antonym relationship;③Chinese is different with Japanese in the modified and be modified relationship, Chinese's productive in the compound verbs is extremely low, generally to combine with dynamic f phrases to express meaning.Next we introduce the lattice hypothesis and the concept of a structure, and borrow Yamamoto(1984) research methods to analyze the center of between before and after pragmatic factors in compound verbs. Through the research we found that Japan-China compound verbs in parallel relationship is two-way center, and in transferred meaning's relationship because before and after the verbs can't break up, together to dominate the subject. Chinese [modified+been modified] relationship of composite verbs [way+movement], [state+movement], [attitude+movement] relationships, the three little types and Japanese [modified and been modified] relationship are right center compound verbs, the surplus of Chinese [modified+been modified] relationship are left center language.Finally to Japan-China [V+V] compound verbs we analyse the corresponding relation of the two languages from mean relationship. We found that because the language system is different, one-to-one compound verbs, only a few exists in parallel relationship and modified and be modified relationship of compound verbs. But the modify the parallel relationship with the modified and be modified relationship of Chinese can find correspondingサverb in the Japanese, perhaps because Japan absorb Chinese characters culture in the early.