On The Administrative Supervision On Chinese Direct-subsidy Giain Policy

Direct-subsidy grain policy is another great policy after the reform of agriculture tax, which makes the further contribution to the opening and marketization of our grain distribution system. However, the formulation, implementation and feedback of direct-subsidy grain policy are comprehensive issues, the administrative supervision on this policy plays an really important role in removing risks and improve efficiency, as a kind of guarantee measure. So far, we have established a set of effective measures on the administrative supervision on direct-subsidy grain policy, which assures the implementation of this policy. Nevertheless, there are still some problems and shortcomings, especially the nonconformity between the farmers'subsidies income and the grain production, the concealment of the standard of direct subsidy, the lack of direct subsidy funds and so on. Therefore, so as to promote China's grain production and ensure food security, figuring out how to improve the efficiency of China's administrative supervision and better utilize the positive effect of the direct-subsidy grain policy becomes the most important issue, which will be discussed in this paper.This paper is divided into three parts:The first part makes a brief introduction of basic situation of our administrative supervision. Firstly, the content of administrative supervision is clarified. In this part, administrative supervision means the inspection, supervision and restraint activities which are leading by various agencies, political parties, people's Political Consultative Conference, social bodies and individuals to supervise the state administrative organs and their staff whether they are lawful and exercise reasonable powers. As one of national supervision system, it is an important part of national administrative supervision system. Then this part mainly discusses China's administrative supervision on direct-subsidy grain policy. As the important component of national administrative supervision system, China's administrative supervision on direct-subsidy grain policy is an important measure to promote the efficiency of this policy, it is the guarantee of arousing enthusiasm, protecting the legitimate rights of farmers and promoting the development balance of various industries. The administrative supervision concerns about many things connected with the decision-making, implementation and feedbacks of direct-subsidy grain policy. Although this administrative supervision system has begun to take shape, it obviously has many aspects to improve, such as the object and scope of subsidies, long-term mechanism and the degree of legislation. As a result, the perfection of administrative supervision of direct-subsidy grain policy, the correct direction and the realization of equity and efficiency of grain policy of direct subsidy has a realistic meaning to the our agriculture development, especially the grain production and the safety of grain production.In second part, it defines the meaning of direct-subsidy grain policy by examining its development history. In this part, grain policy of direct subsidy is the fiscal transfer payment to the grain production, and its essence is the re-distribution process which the governments deal with national income. Then the grain direct subsidy can be divided into linked and non-linked subsidy based on the condition of the distribution measures. If it is distributed based on the subsidy standard, the direct subsidy can be divided into fixed and price differentials subsidy. However, the shortcomings of the administrative supervision of direct-subsidy grain policy is mainly the nonconformity between the farmers' subsidies, income and the grain production, the concealment of the standard of direct subsidy, the lack of direct subsidy funds and so on, all of these lead to the unfairness of the direct-subsidy grain policy. As a result, it reduces the efficiency of the direct subsidy. However, the main reason is the lack of steady supervision mechanism, and the direct-subsidy grain policy can't be exercised effectively without it. Moreover, the fair and reasonable distribution of the subsidy funds has a profound meaning to the realization of the goal of our grain policy of direct subsidy, it means that, the reasonable implement can improve the exercise efficiency of this policy. As long as farmers'production satisfies to requirements, they can obtain the direct subsidy, this measure can arouse farmers' enthusiasm. Then the conformity between farmers'production programs and the subsidy objects has a profound meaning to deeper the grain production and ensure the grain safety. That is. the reasonable and fair implement of the grain subsidy has direct influence to the realization of this policy. But in the actual grain subsidy process, because of the main fund source is the grain risk fund, and the nonconformity between the government burden and grain production subsidy of the main grain producing areas and non-producing areas, so the more the local production, the great contribution to the grain safety, and the greater the burden is, and it is a major obstacle to the reasonable implement of the grain policy of direct subsidy. However, in many local areas, the distribution of grain subsidy based on lands apparently violates the principle of fairness, farmers who product can not obtain subsidy, however, those who did not product obtain the subsidy, in this way, the objective of the direct-subsidy grain policy can not be reached. Then the final objective of administrative supervision of direct-subsidy grain policy is the realization of the fairness and efficiency, and it is also the key to deal with this problem. In a word, the perfection of grain policy of direct subsidy has a realistic meaning to the promotion of the grain production and the market steady, the realization of making a good living.The third part of this paper mainly shows the existed problem of administrative supervision of direct-subsidy grain policy. Based on some basic theories of administrative supervision. I made a comprehensive research on the American and French administrative supervision experience in order to establish and improve our administrative supervision of direct-subsidy grain policy, and promote the creative information disclosure system from a macroscopic perspective to strengthen the government information disclosure system. Additionally, the way and content of the direct subsidy should be shown in public and establish a transparent government and publicity spokesman to make sure the validity of the information in public. From micro angle, this part promotes that the perfection of our direct-subsidy grain policy, the correct subsidy object, and the perfection of government administrative supervision and the evaluation system, even the feedbacks and supervision mechanism in the process of implement of the grain direct subsidy is necessary. As a result, it can further promote China's grain direct subsidy, further improve the fairness and efficiency of the policy, then promote food production, raise farm income, enhance the credibility of this policy, thus promote the building of new socialist countryside and rural social harmony.Finally, this paper makes a brief conclusion to the relative administrative polices, they are shown as follow:firstly, whether the Chief Ombudsman should be set based on this problem? secondly, this paper did not make a comprehensive research on the specific implement process in the implement process of direct-subsidy grain policy, just made a research on the key point of the grain direct subsidy in a micro perspective and did not mention the supervision on the protection prices, and the supervision on precise number of candidates applying for subsidy.In sum, I think it is quite meaningful to do more research on these pending questions mentioned above in order to ensure the implementation and better utilization of direct-subsidy grain policy, to promote our country's food security and rural incomes,to promote the strategic adjustment of industrial structure in rural areas, to reduce the difference between the cities and rural areas, to maintain social stability in rural areas and eventually, to successfully achieve the great goal of Building socialism new countryside.