Research On The Allocation Of Funds In Chengdu's New Model Of Village Governance

In urban and rural comprehensive reform pilot area real background, the original village governance model has become increasingly unsuited to the needs of urban and rural development, village-level governance choices related to the village level socio-economic development and stability. New village-level governance of public funds in the configuration in Chengdu, the role of village governance has become one of academic focus, to promote the three spheres of urban and rural development in Chengdu, the use of limited funding, select the appropriate the development of various spheres of village governance become an important task.This article draws governance theory, public goods theory, the efficiency of public finance theory, Review of village governance in rural grass-roots public finance, the efficient use of rural public finance management and other related information under the premise of the three spheres of village governance in Chengdu The new model, as well as the implementation of the new village-level governance achievements and face the dilemma.The three spheres of Chengdu,19 districts and counties under the jurisdiction of 204 village cadres and villagers carried out a field survey from the money supply and demand of the main features of the main features of two dimensions, with estimates predicting Chengdu in 2020 gap between supply and demand of funds village-level governance, select the per capita financial support for agriculture funds, per capita household loans by financial institutions and village self-financing as the input indicators per capita, urbanization rate, the per capita primary industry, per capita net income of the villagers and the villagers living space per capita as the output indicators, the use of DEA analysis examined from 2006 to 2009 in 19 districts and counties of Chengdu, capital allocation efficiency of village governance.The main ideas and conclusions:(1) Chengdu, there is insufficient number of village-level governance of the main objectives of supply and demand is inconsistent with the double bottleneck, if not effectively addressed, urban and rural development will be hindered. The demand for village-level governance of funds of funds far more than the public supply; coupled with supply and demand of funds into the main objectives are inconsistent in some respects, is bound to slow down the pace of reform in village governance.(2) the three spheres of village governance, Chengdu allocation efficiency varied significantly. Level of economic development of a circle than the two-story three times, more efficient capital allocation techniques, the level of the second circle is roughly equal to the level of Chengdu, the three spheres of technical efficiency is low; the size of the capital allocation efficiency, capital allocation of a circle through the village governance scale decreased, while the third circle of village governance efficiency of capital allocation by funding constraints, at the stage of constant returns to scale.(3) reform of capital allocation system is to promote one or two key spheres of village governance to improve and increase financial support for agriculture and rural credit investment funds of the three spheres of village-level governance has significant role in promoting. Increase in the first, second circle Financial Fund for Agriculture and rural investment credit funds has not improved the status of village governance. Increase financial support for agriculture and the three spheres of investment credit funds in rural areas, village-level governance can promote the efficiency of capital allocation size, thereby promoting the continuous improvement of village governance.The paper concludes that while a few suggestions to improve the new type of village governance, capital allocation efficiency. First, urban and rural reform pilot area with preferential policies, to develop appropriate policies. Second, the increase in underdeveloped financial expenditures at the village level, regulate the functions of government to meet its financial support for agriculture. Third, opening up the rural financial market and encourage the development of new rural financial institutions.