Mine Accidents Frequently Behind The Game And Behavioral Economics Analysis

National safety supervision and administration of dispatching center data show that the past twenty years, China mining accidents in annual death toll around 6,000, namely everyday have nearly twenty miners died in coal mining accidents. In the raw coal output, China occupies 35%, but coal miners death toll in the world. China has accounted for 80%. Mine disaster not only directly threatens coal worker's life safety, and give a coal enterprise caused significant economic losses. As an important foundation energy, coal production not safety situation destroys our country's environmental quality, also restricts the sustainable growth of economy in our country, but also seriously affect Chinese human rights situation and social stability.Coal mining accidents in China's current economic and social development process for a very serious problem, not only sparks that public think this problem from various aspects, but also causes countries highly valued. In the national policy repeating an order time and again, standard safety production conditions, there will be also many mine accidents. In recent years,our country's coal mine safety situation into small coal mines accidents frequent situation eased,, meanwhile state-owned or large coal mine safety situation is more serious.From the Angle of Behavioral Economics, this thesis applie behavior economics expectations theory and cognitive dissonance theory evolutionary game model, try to analyze our country's coal mines accidents frequent reason by evolutionary game model from behavioral economics perspective. At home, using Behavioral Economics analysis coal mines accidents still less, and analyzing our country's coal mines accidents by evolutionary game model from behavioral economics perspective much less.Behavioral economics is the study of the imperfect rationality complicated market's economic phenomenon practical subject. It research economic from the psychological point, and enhance the economics explanation capabilities to real life various economic phenomenon. This article reviewes Behavioral Economics from the connotation, main theories and research method, And one of the expectations theory and cognitive dissonance theory expounded emphatically. Meanwhile raises creatively mine hosts cognitive accident probability, mine hosts cognitive losses size of coal mines accidents the two new concepts.This thesis use Behavioral Economics analyzing coal mining accidents frequent reason on the basis of the evolutionary game model.Evolutionary game theory is a kind of development and perfection to classic game theory at the end of the 20th century. Evolutionary game theory is currently widely used in the social, economic and biology, the domestic research from 21st century begins, using evolutionary game analysis coal mining accidents still less.This thesis by evolutionary game model and Behavioral Economics to our country's coal mines accidents frequent reason made explained from the psychology Angle, First on the basis of analyzing traditional economic security investment-benefit model, through the structure of mine hosts cognitive dissonance model to analyze coal mining accidents frequent reasons, and then using the evolutionary game model optimization mine owner cognitive dissonance, through the analysis the relationship between mine hosts cognitive dissonance and coal mine safety investment, thus find to affect coal mines accidents major factors. For Behavioral Economics limited in traditional economics difficult to explain the problems to explain has not proposed the corresponding solution phenomenon, this paper attempts to apply fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method to analyze influence coal mines accidents related major factors, put out the coal mining enterprises must first raise the risk expected probability can effectively reduce coal mines accidents, understand deeply our country's coal mines accidents frequent cause. Finally, the article put forward reduce coal mines accidents suggestions and countermeasures based on the analysis results.