The Analyzing For The Cases Of The Hypertensive Disorder In Pregnancy

Objective: Hypertensive disorder in Pregnancy was the special diseaseduring Pregnaney and was a leading cause resulting in the maternal and fetaldeath. The cause of the disease and pathogenesis were not complete clearlyuntil now. The pathophysiology of preeclampsia-preeclampsia was the mainbody of the small artery spasm, which leaded to a series of pathologicalchanges and the key of the serious complications and preterm infant. Thesmall artery spasm played an important role in treatment and prevention ofHypertensive disorder in Pregnancy. Through analyzing the data of the normalpatients and Hypertensive disorder in pregnancy, we discussed the incidenceof hypertension disease complications and the outcome of preterm infant,which played an important role to prevent the disease and the premature anddeath of the preterm infant.Methods: We had collected the clinical data:86cases of Hypertensivedisorder in Pregnancy and87cases of normal patients. We got informationthrough the statistical work with SPSS18, which used the t test, χ2inspectionand χ~2correction. The results took α=0.05, P <0.05, which said with astatistical significance.Conclusion:1The percentage of severe preeclampsia-eclampsia was68.24%in the85cases of early cases of eclampsia-seizures,which said that the severepreeclampsia-eclampsia was the Important part.2The result of age was no statistical difference (P>0.05) in Hypertensivedisorder in Pregnancy and the normal patients. The patients of Pregnancyhypertension were longer than normal the normal patients (P<0.05)in thehospital; The results of hypertension family history,end early pregnancy wayand maternal (P<0.05) were existing statistical significance. 3The results of birth weightand premature birth aspects (P<0.05) wereexisting statistical significance in Hypertensive disorder in Pregnancy and thenormal patients. In the begat the comparison, The results of intrauterine fetaldistress the FGR and stillbirth (P<0.05) were existing statistical significancebetween the two groups.4We analysised the percentage of Hypertensive disorder in pregnancy ofthe disease complications, which from high to low was: pregnancyhypertension retinopathy(42.42%),abruption(18.18%),pregnancy hypertensiveheart disease(18.18%), HELLP syndrome(12.12%), postpartum hemorrhage(9.09%).The largest pregnancy was the proportion of pregnancy hypertensionretinopathy.5We divided into two groups according to have complications inhypertensive patients. The results of premature birth and birth weight werestatistically significant (P<0.05) between the two groups; The results of fetaldistress and the FGR were without significant difference (P>0.05).6The results between city and rural areas were statistically difference(P<0.05) of preeclampsia-preeclampsia in the hypertensive patients.Discussion:1In our collection of cases, the higher percentage of the severepreeclampsia-eclampsia relates to the level of our hospital which is threefirst-class hospital.2The patients of Hypertensive disorder in Pregnancy was significantlyhigher than the patients of normal blood pressure in the time in hospital, thepatients family history and cesarean section rate. The rate of Pregnancy oncemore was higher than the patients of Pregnancy the first time.3The patients of Hypertensive disorder was obviously lower than thosewith normal blood pressure in birth weight. The patients of Hypertensivedisorder were higher than those with normal blood pressure in Prematurebabies, fetal distress, FGR and Perinatal mortality.4We analysised the percentage of Hypertensive disorder in pregnancy ofthe disease complications, which from high to low was: pregnancy hyper- tension retinopathy, abruption, pregnancy hypertensive heart disease, HELLPsyndrome, postpartum hemorrhage. The largest pregnancy was the proportionof pregnancy hypertension retinopathy.5The group of Complications was higher than no complications group inthe premature birth.The group of Complications was less than no complica-tions group in birth weight.The results of IUFD and the FGR are no statisticaldifference, which may be limited too few cases.6In our collection of cases, the Rural maternal was higher than thematernal town in severe preeclampsia-eclampsia.