Implicit And Explicit Altruistic Behavior And Its Prediction Sources Studied

"Merciful, therefore, also known as good"，"Merciful therefore" refers to a largeextent of altruistic behavior, it should be seen as a good form of an importantmanifestation of that is, good deeds. The so-called altruistic behavior is to expect noreturn, volunteer to help show the behavior of others. According to the altruistic behaviordifferences in measurement tools can be altruistic behavior is divided into explicit andimplicit altruistic behavior: Explicit altruistic behavior typically be measured byquestionnaire or peer rating scale,By the individual consciousness dominated;Implicitaltruistic behavior measurement can be achieved through implicit social cognition tests,belongs to the unconscious automatic process.personality, empathy, and guilt areimportant predictors of Individual altruistic behavior.In order to investigate the general characteristics of the implicit and explicitaltruistic behavior, and the relationship among Personality, empathy, guilt, and altruisticbehavior, and to Build the development model of the predictors of altruistic behavior. weselected primary and secondary school students as subjects, and adopt the method ofquestionnaires, and experiments combining. The study was supported by two sub-components: By exploring hidden altruistic behavior and the validity of the measurementtools, and analyzed the relationship between implicit and explicit altruisticbehavior;Study2explored in the study based on the general characteristics of altruisticbehavior and personality, the relationship of empathy and guilt, and build the generaldevelopment of the model of explicit altruistic behavior influencing factors.The resultsare as follows:Go/no-go association test can be used as a measure implicit altruism behavior of aneffective measurement method, and the Go/no-go association test confirmed implicitaltruistic behavior is a common.Altruistic behavior of implicit and explicit altruisticbehavior is separated from each other, indicating that the two do not belong to thealtruism of the same dimension.Various variables on gender differences as follows: The girls in altruistic behavior,empathy, and agreeableness was significantly higher than boys. In the home, the difference as follows: Rural students, altruism, empathy, guilt and sense of responsibilitywas significantly higher than urban students. Grade differences were as follows:Altruistic behavior in all grades are not significantly different, students’ sense ofresponsibility and empathy is the higher grades and a significant increase in the guilt ofthe fourth-grade students was significantly higher than the first day and sophomorestudents, the openness of the first students was significantly higher than other students.Whether as a class cadre on the difference expressed as:As a class cadre of students inaltruistic behavior, extra version, agreeableness, responsibility and openness aresignificantly higher than not serve students. The differences in birth order were as follows:Individuals born in the middle of empathic ability was significantly higher thanindividuals born in other sequenced.Personality, empathy, guilt, are important predictors of source of explicit altruisticbehavior, and there are varying degrees of significant positive effects on explicit altruisticbehavior. Guilt is the relationship between mediating variables of empathy and explicitaltruistic behavior. Emotional stability is the relationship between the adjustmentvariables of empathy, guilt and explicit altruistic behavior. Grade variables play aregulatory role in the relationship between personality, empathy, and guilt and outside theobvious altruistic behavior. Not there was significant correlation between guilt, empathyand implicit altruistic behavior,guilt and empathy are not predictors of implicit altruisticbehavior; There were significant positive correlation between extra version traits andimplicit altruistic behavior.