Problems Study Of Hurt In The Process Of Achieving Justice

Humans in any moment are faced with to nature and practice whichitself has no control of disaster and risk. It is useful to be one-sidedexpansion in happiness, luck in prominent place, makes it possible toexpand the scope of the injury, make main body is not in the realization ofjustice, but waiting for justice. On the usefulness of expanding at thesame time, still need to reflect on the moral concept itself contains useful.A possibility of injury, and the usefulness of the inseparable, also withpractice tightly, as this may damage has been enlarged, namely theusefulness of independence and the good, the good is greater than theright, in other words, moral concept faded, the usefulness of theprominent is the generation of contemporary moral crisis, is the naturalevolution and social evolution against the fundamental. Then,desalination usefulness, to reply to the moral premise, justice will beunderstood to do their own thing, then is a kind of communication may.To do their own thing, do not speak but speak not interference,interference, interference is a concept about possible interactions, but notis your own business. No interference is special, part, is associated withindividual may damage contact; interference is to expand the possibleharm. By avoiding the possible injury, thus negating the potential harm,and certainly no interference justice-people have played the role, it isthe negative statements and justice, so that the usefulness of virtueconcept based. But because of virtue concept itself contains useful, theusefulness of logic inherent, may damage included in virtue.First，When it comes to virtue, useful and happy morality, usefulnessand happiness is not dominant. The usefulness of the utilitarianism in theevolution process, the function principle of happiness has deviated fromthe cornerstone of the virtue and become an independent part, it forms thegood than as well on the part of the person’s injury, making moral fallsinto dilemma: on the nature, the survival of the fittest survival of the fittest; moral character, part of the resulting in inferior the actor discard.From a personal point of view of justice, it is people’s Choice-at leastnot the passive choice. If enough justice, institutional and individual howto avoid injury, as well as promoting the justice of virtue. In this process,the individual is always in compliance with the order, but also in thedestruction order. It also is another problem, personal and institutionalconstraint conflict, even if this constraint in a particular historical periodis correct, also is the outstanding good and effective and good conflict-Discussion on this issue is not intended to circumvent, tight to points outthe possible source of damage one of the.Second，The understanding of justice for personal choice and relatedsystem, the need for further explanation is, effects of individual choiceand institutional factors, discusses the perspective of mainly from thepersonal condition of limiting factors, on the system is involved lesser,the establishment and operation of systems is ultimately a matter is thepeople’s choice. Further discussion is around, risk, brave self security, andmoral responsibility, phase separation by the private sector to the publicsector risk shift start.Third，Moral development through the usefulness in social life playsan increasingly important role, virtue seem increasingly marginalized,only face the usefulness of the defect, face contains useful concept ofvirtue, virtue do not become possible. Religion is flawed, but because theperson is not perfect, for all people, including virtue. It is this flaw,relying solely on the people themselves are difficult to overcome. AsAristotle said, moral concerns people realize how; on the other hand thereflection of system to promote the realization of justice, in the systemlevel of repair and restoration of distinction, and the return is greater thanthe potential harm.