Font Size: a A A

China’s Borderland Administration Mode Change And Innovation Research

Posted on:2013-01-15Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:J YaoFull Text:PDF
GTID:2246330374459918Subject:Administrative Management
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
In China, the border area government is a national governance highlights. The border area safety, stability and development, depend on the administrative efficiency, and the border area government effect and the revolution and is directly related to the country’s stability, unity, development and prosperity. The administration of the frontier regions in China is an old topic, the central governments of past dynasties have given the border area government very seriously. Review the history, emotionalism and institutionalism governance model, ethnic nationalism and Regionalism in the border area government manages mode, has been on the stage there is a second master, cooperate with each other. Since the founding of new China, the Chinese Communist Party to run the state power for China’s Borderland Administration turned over new one page, infuse new content, thereby forming a take on an altogether new aspect of Frontier governance mode.According to the geographic location and historical significance of the special Tibet autonomous region as an example, from the Tibet autonomous region before and after the establishment, to reforming and opening since the five Forum on work in Tibet hold, enumerate the central Tibet policy and mode change. First of all, the first chapter of this paper raises two main modes of administration of the frontier regions, ethnic nationalism and regionalism, humanism and emotion regulation theory, as a theoretical analysis framework. Secondly, the second chapter of this article on Tibet contemporary management practice of review and reflection, is also to the border area government pattern changes of empirical analysis. The author here mainly combs the early establishment of Tibet autonomous region since reform and opening up two time central Tibet policy, ethnic nationalism and Regionalism in the governance mode on the basis of review and summary, emphasize classification analysis to the five Forum on work in Tibet for the time series of emotionalism and regulatory governance pattern of policy performance. In the third chapter of this paper is to the border area government pattern innovation theoretical assumption, in the retention of ethnic nationalism and emotionalism advantages at the same time, strengthen the regionalism and institutionalism governance color, strengthen its construction mode, in order to comply with the development and change, make up the ethnic nationalism and emotionalism limitations, to promote our country border management efficiency.
Keywords/Search Tags:Borderland Administration, Emotionalism, Regulative Ideology, Inter-ethnic Ideology, Regionalism
PDF Full Text Request
Related items