The Structure And Characteristics Of Athletes Peer Bullying

Bullying prevalent in young students, and the mental health of young people have a very large hazards, past20years has been a hot research psychologist at home and abroad. Previous studies mainly on the general status of primary and secondary school bullying description, from bullying and less attention on the category, the study of bullying behavior from the athletes start to explore the dimensions of the structure of bullying athletes.The study included three studies, four surveys.Study a126student athletes in open-ended questionnaire study initially established the structure of bullying fellow athletes, for athletes to determine the dimensions of peer bullying and measurement questionnaire prepared to provide first-hand information.Of two to445athletes to the test object, item analysis, exploratory factor analysis to filter entries, and ultimately the formation of two-dimensional scale [athletes] peer bullying.Of three surveys of328athletes, the use of structural equation model of the structure of bullying fellow athletes tested, proven structure fit better.The fourth survey to376athletes to conduct research on the characteristics of bullying fellow athletes were studied. Finally, the following conclusions:1. Through exploratory factor analysis, speech/relationship bullying and domination/control factor dimensions of bullying2bullying fellow athletes were described and defined. Accordingly, the preparation of [athletes] peer bullying scale has good reliability and validity.2. through structural equation model of peer bullying scale [athletes] conducted a cross-sample validity testing, the results prove that the two dimensions of bullying athletes structural stability.3. In the control/control dimension of sex differences in bullying, male athletes scored significantly higher than female athletes.4. In speech/bully relationship dimensions, there are differences between different projects. Physical speed of the dominant class project scored the highest, the dominant class than the skill score of four items were significantly higher. Skills led quite different categories of projects.5. In the control/control bullying dimension, there are differences between different projects. Physical strength of the dominant class project quickly scored the highest skill games against similar projects leading the lowest score, skill differences between the dominant class of four large projects.