| Evaluation method is introduced to the now traditionalperformance evaluation of the superficial way to adapt to the higherdemands of educational trends in the new examination and evaluation,the transition to a comprehensive evaluation of the quality, it isnecessary to be scientific, systematic, and easy to operateexamination and evaluation mode. The S-P Chart Evaluation methodtakes the thought of formation evaluation as its foundation,havingthe picture一like information and strong formation of controllingand analyzing data,which is the most welcomed by the educators andresearchers and used in many kinds and a large scales ofexaminations. However, there are some not entirely as desired placesappeared in the study and application of S-P Chart Evaluationmethod.So this article aims to applicate the SP table analysis relatedparameters calculated results combined with a qualitative study of thetheory means test papers from a course evaluation as the startingpoint, and then conducts a systematic in-depth analysis of theteaching situation of the corresponding courses content.The whole paper mainly includes two parts:For the first part, we made a detailed analysis of the classic S-Ptable evaluation theory, research and discussion, a special analysis ofthe combined with the necessity of applications of the S-P table in theamount of research and qualitative research method, also we made aanalysis on the application scope of S-P Chart Evaluation method.For the second part, the S-P table analysis application. In thispaper, we use the final test of the "C Programming Language" courseof three years as the object of analysis, and also we study a statisticalsummary analysis of test scores of students in the three papers, andthe quality of papers and teaching knowledge coverage. We draw itscorresponding SP curve to calculate the statistics of their attentioncoefficient, and at the same time to identify those beyond the standard value. Initially this article give coefficient correspondingto the results of the analysis of the problems of the students andexaminers, to find these questions corresponding to the teachingknowledge, combined with the use of the interview, and ultimatelygive the teachers some advice on the students, questions andcurriculum teaching knowledge reference teaching feedbackrecommendations.The main conclusion of the study and contributions: improve theevaluation of the S-P chart analysis, using a combination of S-Panalysis and qualitative research interview analysis.It was also foundand summed up that there are some common problems of the needs ofteachers to give more attention to the teaching content, teachingaspects and factors, and ultimately fed back to the teachers, in studentlearning situation, answers and appropriate knowledge of teachingmethods. So we hope that the teachers can give more attention andmake the necessary correction and optimization in the teachingprocess in the future... |