Evaluation Of The Effects Of Real Estate Macro-control Policies

Form the developer’s own pricing policy of China’s real estate market with monopoly thepredatory pricing mechanism, causing the real estate market inefficient allocation of resourcesand waste of resources, a lot of idle land hoarding and vacant housing, generally overheatedinvestment and speculation, real housing consumption those who can not afford housing. Thereal estate prices continued investment in the real estate market overheating, core prices aretoo high and the structural imbalance, triggered by the economic bubble, not only to increasethe financial risk and social risk, government regulation and policy research becomes wasurgent and very necessary. In recent years, the government real estate control policies aresystematically combing through statistical data analysis and logical combination of empiricalresearch methods, the impact and effect of the government’s macro-control policy, forexample by Guangzhou real estate analysis, to put forward their own thinking on the realestate market regulation and the healthy development of China’s real estate industry putforward some constructive ideas and opinions. The analysis shows that Guangzhou, thesecondary market by the impact of the government’s macro-control of the New Deal, thetrading volume in2010and2011and2009year-on-year decreases were market access subjectto certain restrictions, real estate investment behavior can be constrained Price, housing pricesin the past two years, with minor fluctuations, but obvious steady growth trend, showing thathousing prices can be controlled. Stage, the Government adopted a series of administrativemeans of the implementation of controls is a direct and effective means of correcting marketproblems, but with the improvement of low-cost housing, low-cost housing and commercialhousing market structure, the government should relax the administrative intervention in thereal estate market.