Research On The Resilience Of The Impoverished Undergraduates And Its Influence Factors

Since the beginning to now more than three decades,The psychological resilienceresearch has become an important area in the study of psychology had beenconfirmed,and more and more researchers are concerning about it.impoverishedundergraduates is a special group of colleges and universities, and their addition toordinary undergraduates assume academic pressure, but also bear the troubles broughtby the family economic poverty. The mental health problems of impoverishedundergraduates has been the focus of attention. Poverty and there is a psychologicalproblem is not necessarily linked, impoverished undergraduates to pay more attentionto the negative aspects of this easily formed to give people a misleading, thatimpoverished undergraduates there must be more psychological problems, but theactual is not the case.Through literature analysis and questionnaire on the basis of this study, from theperspective of positive psychology to explore the impoverished undergraduates,investigated the relationship between the development of impoverished undergraduatedsresilience and social support and coping style. Based on this study, come to thefollowing conclusions:(1)Overall, impoverished undergraduates and ordinary undergraduates in thedevelopment of resilience there are significant differences. In ther factors,theimpoverished undergraduates in resilience in their self-efficacy-self-perception,self-efficacy-a sense of the future, organizational style, social skills and socialresources exist significant differences;only in family cohesion don’t exist significantdifferences.(2)The development of the psychological resilience of impoverishedundergraduates in the grade there are very significant differences. In ther factors,self-efficacy-the sense of the future, the organization style, social skills, there aresignificant differences (P <.05), social resources, there are very significant differences(P <.01), in family cohesion factors, and there is no difference.Control grade factor analysis of resilience differences of the impoverishedundergraduates and ordinary undergraduates, the results show that the junior and seniortwo grades of impoverished undergraduates and ordinary undergraduates existsignificant differences in resilience, freshman and sophomore have no grade differences.In control whether impoverished undergraduates this factor, impoverished undergraduates and ordinary undergraduates exist grade differences. The results showthat for impoverished undergraduates, freshman and junior and senior, sophomore andjunior and senior exist significant difference in resilience; For ordinary undergraduates,freshman and senior, sophomore exist significant differences with senior in resilience.(3)Overall, the resilence of gender difference are significant, boys in resiliencewas significantly higher than that of girls.(4)In the final scores of resilience,one-child and non-only child in impoverishedundergraduates exist significant defference, non-only child in resilience wassignificantly higher than that of one-child; there was no significant difference amongimpoverished undergraduates in resilience who come fome different family.(5)There is significant positive correlation between the resilience of impoverishedundergraduates and the three factos of social support: objective support, subjectivesupport and utilization of support.(6)There is significant positive correlation between the resilience of impoverishedundergraduates and copying styles. In the factors of coping styles, mature coping styleexist significant positive correlation with high resilience, and immature coping styleexist significant negative correlation with resilience.