Study On The Fu Sinian、Qian Mu、Guo Moruo’s Histrorical Comparative Method

The first half of the20th century China is in the era of great change, but also produce the masters of the era of history, as Engels Acura sixteenth century, the situation in Europe,"a giant and the giant-thinking ability, enthusiasm and personality, versatile and knowledgeable of the era of giants."In this process, the history of China can be described as a hundred schools of thought contend, letting a hundred flowers bloom. Among them, there are three wonderful especially eye-catching, and they lead the three major directions of the Chinese New History historians development showing a colorful picture of the brilliant three wonderful Fu Sinian Qian Mu, Guo Moruo.This paper is divided into four chapters Compilation:Introduction, Fu Sinian Qian Mu, Guo Moruo historical data collection and its finishing method of comparison; Chapter II,Fu Sinian Qian Mu, Guo Moruo nterpretation of the comparative historian; Chapter3, Fu Sinian Qian Mu, Guo Moruo historian similarities and differences between the analysis of the reasons.By analyzing the article:the first half of the twentieth century Fu Sinian Qian Mu, Guo Moruo Chinese historiography from the traditional to the modern transformation process three representative historian. They have made outstanding achievements in their respective areas historian, reflecting the progress and diversity of Chinese historiography to the modern transformation. Close academic exchanges between them, there are many differences, reflecting the differences of each other Historical Studies, at the same time with each other scholarship purport and there are many similarities, their academic, academic meteorological exist, differences in the guiding ideology scholarship purport belong to different schools of the same era. Fu Sinian advocated natural scientific methods to study the history of China,"Science of Oriental Studies of the orthodox in China"; Qian advocated rhetoric, textual argumentation combination of its mission, the revival of national culture; Guo by Marxist theory as a guide to study the changes in the law of social history. Across an unbridgeable gap between the three. This is the same era, the three historians in the comparison made in the complex historical changes of their own choosing. But at the same time on them, but also reflects the common characteristics:First, the profound imprint of the era of great change, the second is the strong influence of traditional culture. Of both Sichuan guru Liu Xianxin, called "mores of period and" social mores ", the influence of the times and the influence of traditional culture. Therefore, to compare the similarities of the three historians historian, contribute to a clear understanding of the20th century history of the multi-path in hand, eventually achieving the same course of development. From such a point of view to study and compare three historians historian academic approach, given the three historians Masters more accurate academic orientation is undoubtedly significant.