Administrative Level And Japan Comparative Study Of The Supervisory System

Statutory authority, ultra vires is not valid. This is not only the executive must follow the principles, but also executive-level oversight of the guidelines. Without laws, regulations, rules, a clear mandate, even if the supervisory authority is to be carried out monitoring behavior, the result would be unconvincing, neither to achieve tangible results. Administrative level in China mainly comes from the legal basis for supervision of "constitution" and "local people’s congresses and local people’s government at all levels" and other laws, regulations and rules. Such as the "Constitution" in Article108:"a place above the county level people’s governments at their respective departments and of leading the people’s governments at lower levels of work, the right to change or withdraw their respective departments and of the lower-level people’s governments of the inappropriate decision.""Local people’s congresses and local people’s governments at all levels of the Organic Law" Article67provides:"provinces, autonomous regions, municipalities, prefectures, counties, autonomous counties, cities and municipal districts of the People’s Government shall assist in the administrative area is to set the management of state organs, enterprises and institutions to work that are not belonged to them, and monitor their compliance with and enforcement of laws and policies." The State Council, November8,2010"issued by the Government on strengthening the legal system views the construction of Article21clearly states:strengthening the level of government supervision and special supervision. Higher administrative organs should strengthen the supervision of the lower administrative organs, and promptly correct the illegal or improper administrative behavior. Government management of the department of administrative areas and higher levels of government law enforcement on the lower levels of government into the most effective supervision of the object of legal and policy basis.Today, corruption has become a serious social problem faced by us, anti-corruption has become a focus of attention. But whenever an official corruption was exposed, we always used to go and from the subjective reasons of corrupt officials, but little or do not seek the formation of the institutional environment of corruption. China’s administrative hierarchy is to say what needs to be improved-the supervisory system. And we should learn from our neighbor-Japan. Japan is a model of studying both Eastern and Western civilization, despite the lack of their own cultural system. But it is undoubtedly the economic and cultural transformation of the most successful model. To learn from its anatomy administrative level supervisory system in depth, as well as to its level of supervision of administrative establishment and improvement of the system is very important.Based on the monitoring system of China’s administrative hierarchy specific analysis and the monitoring system to Japan’s administrative level analysis, proposed comparison. China’s administrative hierarchy of the supervisory system to think and make suggestions to China’s administrative hierarchy supervision will be improved.