| As the establishment of China-ASEAN free trade area, China and ASEAN member countries market access conditions became easy, trade flows more freely. In2009, The number that China’s exports to ASEAN more than the number to Japan, ASEAN has become the third-largest export destination after the European Union and the United States. On the one hand, the association of southeast Asian nations in the face of China’s large cheap and fine products into the local market, can feel the competition pressure, is bound to more anti-dumping investigations against China. Since1997, the ASEAN countries started to China anti-dumping investigation. On the another aspect, many ASEAN members and China is a labor-intensive country, cheaper in some products, these products in the Chinese market, Chinese enterprises face greater competition. However, in contrast, China’s anti-dumping cases were rare for imported goods, from1997to date, a total of more than60pieces, including the number of ASEAN countries accounts for less than ten. China’s anti-dumping cases filed against the ASEAN countries are less, doesn’t mean that dumping is less, but because domestic enterprises know about antidumping law, is not actively against foreign anti-dumping investigation application products. Therefore, familiar with the association of southeast Asian nations (ASEAN) antidumping law is needed. Based on the number of trade exchanges between China and ASEAN countries as well as the geographic location, select in the perspective of Singapore, Indonesia, Thailand, the comparative analysis between China and the similarities and differences of antidumping law, the three countries from ASEAN countries the advantages of antidumping law, in order to improve China’s anti-dumping law. So that is conducive to China’s growing trade with those countries, reasonable avoid anti-dumping from country to country, but also to improve China’s positive domestic anti-dumping laws to maintain their own trade interests.This paper is divided into four chapters:The first chapter introduces the legal source of the China and Singapore, Indonesia, Thailand, and more.Chapter two is compare the difference about substantive law among China and Singapore, Indonesia, Thailand. It is mainly divided into two parts:the first part is the determination of dumping, determination of dumping involves determination of normal value and export price, similar products and non-market economy countries related problem; The determination of the second part is the damage, the significance of this part includes damage, causal relationship between dumping and damage.Chapter three is compare the difference about procedural law among China, Indonesia, Thailand and Singapore. It is divided into five parts:the first part is the anti-dumping start, the second part is the main part of the start, the third part is the survey method and duration, the fourth part is the ruling, the fifth part is the judicial review.The fourth chapter is based on the comparison of the above three chapters, from Singapore, Indonesia, Thailand anti-dumping law more perfect place, improving Suggestions to our country anti-dumping law. Advice in this chapter includes three parts:the first part is to improve the legislative level, the second part is about the substantive law advice and the suggestion on the third part is about the procedural law. |
PDF Full Text Request