The Protection Of Citizen’s Right To Speak In Public Domain Decision

Citizen participation in public decision-making is a very effective form ofpolitical democracy, can enhance communication of government departments andordinary citizens,let the decision-making authority hear more voices from thesociety,and allow citizens to influence government decision.So, decision-makingauthority in decision-making can take full account of the public’s acceptance, can notonly improve the scientific and democratic decision-making government, but alsomake the implementation of public policies smoother, more suitable with socialsituations.With the construction of China’s socialist democracy and the rule of law, thegovernment established the scientific and democratic decision-making concept,meaning the political rights of our citizens is gradually waking up. People began tofocus on the work of government departments and hope to make suggestions andrecommendations, as well as requirements can be effectively participate in andmaking process affecting the relationship between their own interests in public policy.And because our democratic political construction is not perfect, bureaucracy forordinary citizens to participate in public decision-making exclusion is in the presenceof many local government departments. The ways of civic participation in decisionmaking is also specific enough to understand, however, this issue has not been wellsolved. Therefore, what kind of system, what means to achieve and protect the rightsof citizens to participate established in public decision-making in China become aneeded problem of democratic political construction to solve.The major systems of citizen participation in public decision making are:Politicaldeliberative systems,People’s Congress system and Hearings system.But, there aremany reasons in practice, Still exist a lot of non-institutionalized participation ofcitizens, for example: sit in government offices, containment government officialsand so on. Non-institutionalized participation of citizens not only can not effectivelyachieve the purpose of participation,but also make the relations between citizens andgovernment worse, hinder the development of our democracy.Then, protection of ourcitizens to participate in public decision-making is very important. It is also the focusof this study.From the issues of citizens’ right speaking, the issues surrounding the protectionof citizens in public decision-making areas to achieve are discussed in five parts.Meanwhile, Problems and corresponding countermeasures are put forward.The first part is an overview of the theory of public policy and civil discourse.This introduces some basic concepts and theories, paving the way for the full text ofthe cornerstone.The second part of the process of public policy making in the necessity andpossibility. This section analyzes the importance and implementation of the realizationof civil rights discourse in the public policy-making field, in order to lay thegroundwork research papers. The third part is the practical considerations of our citizens’ speech rightsrealization. According to the theory into the reality in our country, from the legislativelevel, the institutional level, the practical level analysis to achieve the status of ourcitizens’speech rights. And problems and shortcomings are pointed outcorrespondently, finally this article analyze the reasons for these problems.The fourth part is about making Countermeasures of protecting citizen’s speechrights’ process in public policy. Transforming the traditional concept, learning theexperience of realization of citizens’ speech rights from mainly foreign countryguarantees the public policy formulation process, improving the relevant legislationprotection and the running of system, this article related to starting research oncountermeasures to solve the security of citizens’ speech rights decision-making in thefield of the problem in four areas.The fifth part of the paper’s closure is a simple outlook for the establishment ofthe protection of our citizens’ speech rights mode with Chinese characteristics. Tohope that the problem discussed in the paper can help defuse public sectordecision-making practices and protect citizens’ speech rights predicament.Realization of civil rights discourse is not very fast thing. The majority ofcitizens and the government departments need to work together. The issue raised inthe paper and solutions to our citizens’ speech right in public decision-making processcan have a positive role in reality. Finally, being an armchair strategist is notacceptable, it is essential to carry out the security to practice.