| As a great communist, Marx,Engels and Lenin’s theory of proletariat political party contains rich theoretical content, and the unity of intrinsic logic, but because of the different time background, Lenin on Marx and Engels’s theory of proletariat political party has a new development. Therefore, comparing the differences between them and the reasons, will help to review and evaluation of Marx,Engels and Lenin’s theory of proletariat political party, identify the failure of the "Soviet model" does not mean the failure of marxism. At the same time, the theory of Lenin proletarian parties influence on later generations, especially its development road in the east of research remains to be further deepened.This paper tries to comprehensively inspects Marx,Engels and Lenin’s theory of the formation of the proletarian party development process; On this basis, combing Marx,Engels and Lenin on the main ideas of the proletarian political party; And then expounds Marx,Engels and Lenin’s theory of proletariat political party is in some ways, the difference of the and analyzes the causes of these differences. Full text is composed of four chapters of the introduction, conclusion and main text, specific as follows:The first part is introduction, mainly elaborated the significance of this selected topic research, current theoretical research present situation and the research methods, main content and innovation.The second part includes chapter2and chapter3. In further reading Marx Lenin classical text, on the basis of combining with the development of the society at that time, the outline of Marx,Engels and Lenin’s theory of proletariat political party, the formation of Marx,Engels and Lenin on a basic understanding of the proletarian party.The third part for the key part of the paper, mainly in the fourth chapter, the comparative analysis of the differences between Marx,Engels and Lenin’s theory of political parties, and these differences on the later development of the theory and practice of the communist party. The fourth part is the conclusion, mainly from the theoretical summary of differences and its influence on later generations. |
